Motors,
witness statements and incident number confirming it was an accident
This would be the only thing making me think twice about this as it sounds like the police did get involved.
Motors,
witness statements and incident number confirming it was an accident
Haha do you feel lucky, of course there are..
So probably fine, but still dishonest as the driver is obviously a higher risk than apparently similar drivers.
It's actually fraud!!!
Are you sure?
This would be the only thing making me think twice about this as it sounds like the police did get involved.
Don't tell them. This is one of those instances where "doing the right thing" will cause nothing but aggro. Sod their future underwriting and stats, they'll manufacture those at will to guarantee a profit anyway.
If anything, unessecary claims hinder the bigger picture for everyone.
No damage to public property or a third party, no foul imo.
Problem is while the odds are low - there are legally binding (and have stood up in law) contract terms in effect and if she has a subsequent accident and it does come to light she could end up liable for the costs of a subsequent accident which could be significant.
So I guess its upto the individual whether they think the odds are worth it.
Problem is while the odds are low - there are legally binding (and have stood up in law) contract terms in effect and if she has a subsequent accident and it does come to light she could end up liable for the costs of a subsequent accident which could be significant.
So I guess its upto the individual whether they think the odds are worth it.
What a total load of nonsense.
How the hell are they going to prove anything? They can't, so it's a nonsense to even talk about it.
How the hell are they going to prove anything? They can't, so it's a nonsense to even talk about it.
How the hell are they going to prove anything? They can't, so it's a nonsense to even talk about it.
By calling the police who have the incident logged in their system, as mentioned in the OP.
Unlikely, yes, impossible, no.