Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Just out of curiosity, as a previous 780SLI owner, where would that sit on the above "Realtive performance" chart? I am trying to guage how much of an improvment the 1080 is over what I had - thanks guys!
Yea...the 1070 has been clocked 16% higher clock than the 1080 to make it look more impressive and for the sake of beating the stock 980Ti and Titan X
*Saw the graphic and bench result
*Predict the Nvidia pulled their good old approach of chopping the CUDA core counts but increase the stock clock speed to make the card look better like 670->760 and Titan X->980Ti when in fact they are slower clock for clock
*Click on link to see article
*Confirm what I predicated and see core clock speed increase from 1607MHz to 1860MHz (thus reducing the overclocking margin available to user comparing to the 1080) for the sake of showing off better performance in all the benchmark for "stock" performance
You are getting a bit too predictable now Nvidia
Comparing an overclocked 980Ti to an overclocked 1070 instead of stock vs stock, or dropping the 1070's clock speed to same as 1080, the 980Ti is probably going to beat it, assuming Nvidia won't have amnesia about the need of optimising for cards that are previous gen for new and upcoming games.
I was just going off the information given here, so I am glad to be proved to be mistaken, as I thought they were pulling what they have done before with both 760 and 980Ti have had their clock speed increased by 10% to compensate for stripping down the core counts from the 670 and Titan X.
