What does it matter if it's supposed to be mid-high range, it is what it is and benchmarks will do the talking
+1
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
What does it matter if it's supposed to be mid-high range, it is what it is and benchmarks will do the talking
Dont really think that's going to be much of an upgrade on your 290.If it's going to be >£300, it looks like I'll probably be looking at a 1060 now.
If it's going to be >£300, it looks like I'll probably be looking at a 1060 now.
Afraid of that too. I should in theory be able to spend £275-£300 2 years after buying my 290 and get a decent upgrade. Doesn't look like it this time.
Afraid of that too. I should in theory be able to spend £275-£300 2 years after buying my 290 and get a decent upgrade. Doesn't look like it this time.
A high end card is a high end card due to it's performance, not name, generation, price, sexy picture on card (think Zotac here). etc.
So both the 1070 and 1080 are currently high end cards, in a 1-2 years time they probably won't be.
My old 8800 GTX was a high end card, now it's just about comparable with the best Intel Iris Graphics and it gives a bit of extra warmth in the winter. (It's in my work PC).
So a cards low to high end status will change over time as new products supersede them.
Not saying the pricing the FE is OTT, we are basically paying an extra £40+ for them to be shipped here once you take other costs in to consideration.
Seems like 1070 will offer around 70% of the performance of the 1080, or in other words, 1080 is around 42% faster than 1070. That's higher than the difference we had with 980 and 970.
I'm not surprised. NVIDIA will probably do that to boost the sales of 1080 which gives them a much higher profit.
Seems like 1070 will offer around 70% of the performance of the 1080, or in other words, 1080 is around 42% faster than 1070. That's higher than the difference we had with 980 and 970.
I'm not surprised. NVIDIA will probably do that to boost the sales of 1080 which gives them a much higher profit.
Seems like 1070 will offer around 70% of the performance of the 1080, or in other words, 1080 is around 42% faster than 1070. That's higher than the difference we had with 980 and 970.
I'm not surprised. NVIDIA will probably do that to boost the sales of 1080 which gives them a much higher profit.
It should probably be there or thereabouts.Benchmark tool scores are Greek to me but is it safe to assume a 1070 will be plenty for 1440p @ 60Hz? I need a new monitor whilst also thinking of a new gpu.