• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Apple chooses AMD to supply its GPU's

My (work) imac suffered that problem. The apple store charged AMD something like $384 for parts and labour replacement. I womet how many people suffered the same.

I very much doubt it as majority of that would be the actual cost of the replacement which wouldnt have been at street price (cost to AMD $50 at most and probably more like $5)

Customer receipt may well say some "random" figure, but that wont be what it actually cost AMD to fulfil the order, so its an arbitrary number.
 
And more recently. https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT203787

What was the last Apple machine sold with a NV GPU? This seems a continuation of the current status quo, something that hasn't exactly done wonders for AMD's bottom line.

While that is indeed more recent, the Nvidia solder defect was on a totally different scale with millions of defective parts. I alone saw two 8800GT's, 3-5 nForce chipsets, a 8400GS (MXM card without which the system was useless - ironically an AiO with a perfectly good Intel chipset with graphic but due the way Nvidia design MXM taking the card out does not enable the onboard), plus a few laptops.

In fact, I just had to fix a Core2 machine for a friend a few weeks ago with an affected nForce chipset. (Still have the faulty motherboard here but didn't try baking it yet since that was usually at best a short term fix.)

To be fair to Apple (and by implication curse HP and Dell), they were about the only OEM who really tried to fix the issue for their customers, but when the chip is inherently faulty replacing it only hides the problem for a while.

The thing which always got me with the Nvidia bumbgate was they way they hid and misled about it. The claim to sell a premium product but when something goes wrong they are far from premium. Premium prices perhaps.

Still the did have to put aside $250 million but I think the true extend was a lot more. Whenever I saw the losses in their Tegra adventure I though, "that $billion was what me and other solder defect sufferers were owed". The whole fiasco does explain why Charlie Demerjian is a persona non grata at Nvidia for exposing their economical ways with the truth.
 
5c? No one in their right mind would make such a deal. The cost of any fails would far exceed any profits made.

Technology companies usually have a margin of 5-10% on average. AMD should be making around $5-10$ profit per APU sold. AMD may be in debt but that does not mean they put themselves in a situation where they could go deeper in the Red.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2308282/amd-makes-more-profit-than-sony-on-the-ps4

edit: you were being sarcastic right? my fail :eek:

Not wanting to take the thread off topic too much, but that article is nonsense.
If Sony sell the console for $399 and it cost them $381 to make it, they make $18 dollars profit, Ok fine.
If AMD sell the APU for $100 and it cost them an undisclosed amount to make it, they make $100 profit, er bit of a fail there.
They either make $100 on each sale and Sony make $399 on each sale Gross, or you remove the cost of making the part and list the NET profit, not mix and match to make a headline.


I expect your right that AMD make around $5-10 for each sale, but certainly not $100.
 
5c? No one in their right mind would make such a deal. The cost of any fails would far exceed any profits made.

Technology companies usually have a margin of 5-10% on average. AMD should be making around $5-10$ profit per APU sold. AMD may be in debt but that does not mean they put themselves in a situation where they could go deeper in the Red.

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/2308282/amd-makes-more-profit-than-sony-on-the-ps4

edit: you were being sarcastic right? my fail :eek:

That article is hilariously conflating profit and revenue. AMD gets $100 or so aper a console but for that they have to design, develop, manufacture and ship hardware, provide ongoing software and driver support, and handle warranties.
 
I very much doubt it as majority of that would be the actual cost of the replacement which wouldnt have been at street price (cost to AMD $50 at most and probably more like $5)

Customer receipt may well say some "random" figure, but that wont be what it actually cost AMD to fulfil the order, so its an arbitrary number.

For the part that is probably true but you can be sure apple will be charging a fair amount for their labour.
 
The margins on the console APU is probably up to about 30% nowadays. It was mid-20s in 2014.

As for the OP topic, I don't think we need a new thread every time AMD sell Apple some cheap chips.
 
Last edited:
That article is hilariously conflating profit and revenue. AMD gets $100 or so aper a console but for that they have to design, develop, manufacture and ship hardware, provide ongoing software and driver support, and handle warranties.

No one said $100 is the profit for AMD. $100 is what AMD get from SONY but after all costs they should be making $5-$10 profit per APU as a minimum.If their profit margin is higher then maybe they are making $20 or more profit per chip.
 
No one said $100 is the profit for AMD. $100 is what AMD get from SONY but after all costs they should be making $5-$10 profit per APU as a minimum.If their profit margin is higher then maybe they are making $20 or more profit per chip.

Did you even read the article:

AMD makes more profit than Sony on the PS4
Sony makes $18, AMD makes close to $100

Sony reportedly is making an $18 profit on its Playstation 4 (PS4), while AMD is likely making around $100 per console sold.


The article us complete nonsense.


The only thing that really matters is the profit from consoles. In 2015 AMD made $200m in their enterprise and semi custom, console are majority but not all of that. Good for AMD but not earth shattering, comparing operating profits for that division declined to half 2014 so even if the margins were some how high sales dropped off substantially.

http://wccftech.com/amd-q4-2015-yearly-financial-earnings/
 
Last edited:
Oh come on, the article deliberately misleads, using the price of the console, listing NET profit, followed by the Gross sale price of the APU.

It is a typical headline to get clicks.

Perhaps, still don't see anything to prove that it's wrong. It does say "reportedly" so taking it as fact and saying it's wrong is a bit daft.
 
Perhaps, still don't see anything to prove that it's wrong. It does say "reportedly" so taking it as fact and saying it's wrong is a bit daft.


I'm sorry I didn't see anyone taking anything as fact and then saying it was wrong.
 
because pointing out that there is no way they make $100 profit from every APU sale means 5c is the only other option? I mean its not like there's 99 other whole dollar options between nothing and 100 is there
 
I was going to post saying no doubt the negtaivity/nvidia defenders will be in here to say

Apple don't sell many computers anyway
Nvidia doesn't need to sell to AMD
AMD must be selling them cheap.

I see I was too late :D

Nvidia didn't want XBox One or PS4, nor do they want the new PS4.5 or the XBox 2.

Nvidia also don't want to be in Mobile Phones and Tablets.

Nvidia wants to be in Driverless cars. :D

This thread hurts
 
Last edited:
because pointing out that there is no way they make $100 profit from every APU sale means 5c is the only other option? I mean its not like there's 99 other whole dollar options between nothing and 100 is there

AIR Its something like $30 per console though I can't remember how we came to that conclusion. It's in another thread somewhere. Probably the AMD are doomed thread.
 
Back
Top Bottom