Australia and New Zealand are already part of a Trade Bloc, APEC which
And Canada is part of NAFTA, which consists of Canada, the US and Mexico.
Australia and New Zealand are already part of a Trade Bloc, APEC which
Very good news for remain though (and not breaking up the UK) I imagine. Scotland will definitely be pushing for an overturn even more now.
Brace yourselves Theresa May is coming!![]()
And Canada is part of NAFTA, which consists of Canada, the US and Mexico.
In that case don't die without asking for consent, or you'll be arrested, along with your family, and all sent to a "re education camp"...
The common man is a god-damn idiot.
But you can't sell them that much in terms of access to the EU either, which is what we like to do, essentially being (erstwhile) brokers of the bloc. That's in essence our trade strategy. Particularly worrying in terms of the EU getting the common services market sorted, and us falling behind that.
The idea is we can now go for the EFTA so to have single market access as before and then also get free trade agreements with countries outside the EU. We couldn't do that before. We will be able to now.
Perhaps in part because we voted in a bunch of MEPs that were actively hostile to Europe (that's if they turned up - see garages attendance history earlier in the thread))...
There is no reason we shouldnt have as large and active a voice as France and Germany, unless we just aren't very good at negotiating and diplomacy - in which case the next couple of years is going to get us a good kicking.
no other trade block has required the political union that the EU has and they being members of those trade blocks doesn't stop them from negotiating with us... again unlike the EU. Their trade blocks don't restrict them like that, EFTA doesn't restrict countries like that... the EU does though!
And yes you can pick off one country - it wasn't NAFTA that did a deal with the EU it was Canada! And you're wrong on TTIP too - that is a deal between the US and the EU... again country to trade block not trade block to trade block.
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a proposed trade agreement between the European Union and the United States, with the aim of promoting trade and multilateral economic growth.[1] The American government considers the TTIP a companion agreement to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).[2] The agreement is under ongoing negotiations and its main three broad areas are: market access; specific regulation; and broader rules and principles and modes of co-operation
1-they are to lazy to fill in a visa\work permit visa.
[TW]Fox;29714196 said:Referendum date announced.
The idea is we can now go for the EFTA so to have single market access as before and then also get free trade agreements with countries outside the EU. We couldn't do that before. We will be able to now.
How do you know we'll be able to?
It's pointless if you can't harmonise the various import and export streams. A job the EU is doing now, and which would add cost to us doing it on our own for the lot of the trading that we do. There are non-tariff barriers to trade, and they're far more significant in international trade now, still look at what China put tariffs on in their Swiss deal, and how much the Swiss shuttle into the common market from China, taking a cut for themselves. The complexity alone makes me think of the mess before trade blocs were a thing.
I'm not convinced it'll be glorious. Cludgy, somewhat working, legalistic and bureaucratic, and perhaps breaking even in decades to come; but glorious/better? Nah.
I'm a glutton for being trolled so here goes...
Have you ever worked abroad and had to get a visa? My partner (Canadian) did to work here in the UK. It's expensive (best part of a grand every three years) and means she's completely tied to the job. If anything were to happen to her employment with the current company it would immediately be illegal for her to be here. No cooling off period, nothing.
If she wants to change jobs she has to find another employer willing to sponsor the visa, pay the fees again, and make sure the switch goes absolutely smoothly to avoid breaking the law.
People saying how easy it is to get a visa to work abroad have no idea what it's like. It's extremely precarious.
It really is tough love for Scotland
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-36656980
Sovereignty is the tender you offer as soon as you step outside your front door. And yes, it was purely a rhetorical device. For all the talk of damn the experts, they'll be increasingly running our lives for the foreseeable future. Let's hope we've still got some of those skilled migrants knocking about, and a few grey trade vets of our own.

Spot on. This is a good read:
http://www.cityam.com/241014/back-o...ealth-friends-and-allies-would-welcome-brexit
But an EU-Australia free trade agreement and a UK-Australia free trade agreement are not mutually exclusive. In fact, it is likely an agreement with the UK, once outside the EU, will be quicker and easier to negotiate, at the very least because Australia would be negotiating with one partner, rather than 28. If Britain were to leave the EU, it should go straight to the front of the queue for a free trade agreement with Australia.
Even though we loyally and reliably fought alongside the UK in two world wars and many other conflicts, Australian citizens are treated significantly less favourably than EU residents for work visas and immigration. Britain’s acquiescence to the EU freedom of movement principles means that one of the few levers left to a UK government seeking to control migration is to severely limit non-EU migration, including Australians.
Bwahahaha
We are sooo ******!
This is god-damn tragic and yet people are trying to spin the whole exit as a success story for the common man.
The common man is a god-damn idiot.
Never has a truer set of words been typed on these forums.
The FTSE is nearly back to pre Brexit, even at the inflated prediction of a remain.
![]()
