Caporegime
No
/thread
According to the theory of relativity it actually does.
No
/thread
According to Prof. Brian Cox (and I tend to agree with him), yes it does. Everything that has ever happened at some point still exists somewhere in spacetime.
No, the Langoliers eat it.
errr... in my peasant mind I think we all know time exists but it is not a 'thing' that can be altered by man or the universe (unless black holes do? Or do they just affect light, light which shows us the 'stuff' that was happening at a moment in time). It's kind of a constant. Maybe the only constant in the universe?
Oi, that's my usual response to this sort of thread!Time is an illusion. Lunchtime, doubly so.
Time is linear. We cannot affect the past but can affect the future. If I rub grass all over myself, in the near future I will break out in hayfever symptoms. If I order something online today then in a couple of days or so I will have caused something to happen, when it gets delivered. If I don't learn my new job then in the future I will get fired.
These things wouldn't have happened had I not done something in the present to alter the future.
The Big Bang exists in all locations in space-time, in every frame of reference - a lot of people have the misconception that the Big Bang "exploded" outwards into "space" but in reality it was an expansion of the entire universe itself, everywhere was the Big Bang.
Yeah I agree I'm saying that time itself cannot be changed by any one or anything. Think of it as a relentless conveyor belt. I think we agree what time is but disagree on what 'exist' means!
edit- when I said constant, I meant it never changes in response to anything, it just keeps plodding along... relatively constant I guess that is??? :s
Time is linear.
Well the past exists because when you look up at stars, your seeing light from thousands of years ago as it takes that long to reach us so your seeing the past when you see the stars. If that helps.
That's not entirely accurate. Due to Special Relativity time is inherently non-linear and the measurement of time is dependent upon your frame of reference (see time dilation and, thus, the Lorentz Factor). Of course, one can argue that measuring time is not equal to time itself but then you get into semantics and philosophy rather than hard Physics.