Don;t do it. A few years ago i held the door open for a women and she gave me a torrent of abuse about how she didnt need a man to help her and I was putting her and other women down and I was a sexist pig.
Misogyny
- Thread starter lafemmefatale
- Start date
Don;t do it. A few years ago i held the door open for a women and she gave me a torrent of abuse about how she didnt need a man to help her and I was putting her and other women down and I was a sexist pig.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,223
I hold doors open for men and women.
95% of the time you get a thanks and occasionally they don't even acknowledge you.
Sexist abuse for holding a door open? I can scarcely believe that.
95% of the time you get a thanks and occasionally they don't even acknowledge you.
Sexist abuse for holding a door open? I can scarcely believe that.
Don;t do it. A few years ago i held the door open for a women and she gave me a torrent of abuse about how she didnt need a man to help her and I was putting her and other women down and I was a sexist pig.
Were you touching yourself whilst you did it?
Don;t do it. A few years ago i held the door open for a women and she gave me a torrent of abuse about how she didnt need a man to help her and I was putting her and other women down and I was a sexist pig.
I'd have slammed it in her face.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
The worlds finally cracked.
it's not "unwanted attention" though when they're wh0ring themselves to a rag for publicity.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 4,255
- Location
- North Sea
Don;t do it. A few years ago i held the door open for a women and she gave me a torrent of abuse about how she didnt need a man to help her and I was putting her and other women down and I was a sexist pig.
Should have told her she was welcome to walk back through the door, then you could let it slam in her face. For equality!
the good news is this means univited engagement like holding a door or giving up a bus seat for them is now no longer allowable.
can't wait to see how they apply this to all the 20+ genders they decided to recognise. a gender-fluid creature asks a partially-androgynous-temporary-lesbihermaph if they want a drink, and all Hell breaks loose.
So what's the score if a woman wolf whistles another woman? Will it still be an offence or will the 'victim' not be offended because the 'offender' was also female? What if the woman whistles back, will she then become the offender too or will they call it quits? What about race?...
The variables on this are ridiculous, how can this possibly be enforced?
The variables on this are ridiculous, how can this possibly be enforced?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2008
- Posts
- 35,711
It does happen.
How can "taking photographs without consent" be a hate crime?
This goes against the current laws that allow photographs to be taken in public places, or private places open to the public as long as there is no expectation of privacy or the owner of the premises asks you to stop.
Consent is not required to take a photograph of someone in a public place.
This goes against the current laws that allow photographs to be taken in public places, or private places open to the public as long as there is no expectation of privacy or the owner of the premises asks you to stop.
Consent is not required to take a photograph of someone in a public place.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,223
I assume it's aimed at weirdos who take pictures of women's arses and ****.
Whilst I don't condone such acts there's nothing illegal about it.
The main laws are:
- Sexual offences act 2003 - Voyerism - Which focuses on photographing "private acts" or installing equipment to capture it.
- Outraging public decency - in common law offence - This would focus more on if the act you are doing is indecent, i.e. if you are lying on the floor aiming upwards whilst taking said picture you are probably breaking the law.
The morality of what photos someone takes are a completely different thing, but it's frustrating that so few people understand that in a public environment a photographer is generally free to take photographs. If permission was required then every time someone planned to take a photo at a concert they'd need to ask every single person in the background for their permission.
In most instances a photographer will of course ask the subject for permission but this is out of common courtesy and nothing to do with a legal requirement.
Last edited:
So at the moment men need to have triple signed and authenticated contracts for sex or risk being accused of rape the next day..
Now men cannot even talk to women without them being triggered, I wonder if the frogbeasts that dreamed up this stupid rule will press charges if it was brad pit?
I wonder how long before all men need to go on sexual harassment courses and 'toxic masculinity, how it has progressed humanity but it is bad now because of my feelings' courses....
I used to wonder why MGTOW was growing in numbers, women these days are ****ing nuts.
Now men cannot even talk to women without them being triggered, I wonder if the frogbeasts that dreamed up this stupid rule will press charges if it was brad pit?
I wonder how long before all men need to go on sexual harassment courses and 'toxic masculinity, how it has progressed humanity but it is bad now because of my feelings' courses....
I used to wonder why MGTOW was growing in numbers, women these days are ****ing nuts.