I'm getting a new monitor at the end of the month to replace my ageing 24" 1200p Samsung monitor. I play games but not as much as l used to. Mostly strategy games, RPG's and maybe an FPS game now and then.
I am between the two monitors mentioned in the thread title but the Acer Predator is similar in spec with the Asus MG279Q from the research l have made.
The Samsung is aesthetically more pleasing than the Asus and Acer and lacks speakers, of which l have no use for. It is also the cheapest of the three, but it's limited to 60Hz and lacks Freesync. I current own an Radeon 380 which supports Freesync but from what l know it shouldn't spend much time above 60Hz on 1440p in the latest games anyway.
Is the higher framerate of the Asus and Acer monitors beneficial in scenarios other than gaming; i.e less eye strain? I remember reading something about higher refresh rates being less strenuous on the eyes but that might have been for CRT screens.
Any recommendations are welcomed
Edit: Please move this thread to monitors please. I should remember not to post threads when intoxicated.
I am between the two monitors mentioned in the thread title but the Acer Predator is similar in spec with the Asus MG279Q from the research l have made.
The Samsung is aesthetically more pleasing than the Asus and Acer and lacks speakers, of which l have no use for. It is also the cheapest of the three, but it's limited to 60Hz and lacks Freesync. I current own an Radeon 380 which supports Freesync but from what l know it shouldn't spend much time above 60Hz on 1440p in the latest games anyway.
Is the higher framerate of the Asus and Acer monitors beneficial in scenarios other than gaming; i.e less eye strain? I remember reading something about higher refresh rates being less strenuous on the eyes but that might have been for CRT screens.
Any recommendations are welcomed

Edit: Please move this thread to monitors please. I should remember not to post threads when intoxicated.

Last edited: