Absolutely fine by me. No doubt the people complaining are ham planets that feel they are being shamed by all the 'unobtainable' bodies.
It's not about coverage or being prude. It's just low class to do it in underwear. It's up there with the council chav lot walking around the streets topless.
People lack so much class.
This is unfortunately most likely the case.
The ONLY except-able form of clothing when sun bathing :
Geez louise, what a bunch of grumpy old prudes we have here!! Get a grip FFS!
It's not about coverage or being prude. It's just low class to do it in underwear. It's up there with the council chav lot walking around the streets topless.
People lack so much class.
I don't know why children are even brought into it, young children are not going to even give a flying **** and probably don't even notice it.
Don't get me wrong I wouldn't let my GF lay in a park with some agent provocateur gear on,
You wouldn't let?
Do you control who she is friends with, what time she's allowed out until and where she is allowed to go as well?
I'm unclear on what harm will come to children if they see someone in their underwear.
Dont really like tanning myself but no problem with others doing it..Undies are fine, seen much worse in most parks..
but its not really correct that undies are pretty much the same as swimwear. Swimwear, being designed to be worn in public, has a number of safety features to protect modesty. If i lie down on the floor in the boxers im wearing now, my meat and veg are fully visible to anyone down wind of me, not so with swim shorts and their netting.
It's not about coverage or being prude. It's just low class to do it in underwear. It's up there with the council chav lot walking around the streets topless.
People lack so much class.
It's not about coverage or being prude. It's just low class to do it in underwear. It's up there with the council chav lot walking around the streets topless.
People lack so much class.