Armed men take French hostages in Rouen church

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if he is able to provide the clip would you then have your insatiable source requests satisfied or are you planning to deflect and ignore then ask how they got their knives and ask for proof they weren't just knife throwers who got lost and thought the priest was part of an act.

insatiable source requests

Please find the last time I requested a source. It is something I very, very rarely do as others have already asked.

Your post is nothing but a delusional rant.
 
The BBC is a total joke of a news source these days. Pretty soon they will have headlines saying: 86 year old Priest fell onto knife.

Its like a Blackadder sketch: Ahh yes the priest who accidentally brutally cut his head off while shaving

We can just have the same conversation every day if you like? :rolleyes:

Please explain to me what is wrong with the BBC headline then:
"France church attack: Priest killed in hostage-taking near Rouen"
 
Judging by the lack of noted left wingers on this thread, even they have given up the ghost now with their Islam defending.

Yeah and just as in other threads we don't see much in the way of condemning these attacks or any sympathy\respect towards the victims from the apologists\sympathisers.

They go straight into deploy their deflect and play down tactics, as always.

There will be a mental health aspects to all this from the usual, its a trend now you see.
 
We can just have the same conversation every day if you like? :rolleyes:

Please explain to me what is wrong with the BBC headline then:
"France church attack: Priest killed in hostage-taking near Rouen"

ISIS Terrorists Behead Priest in French Church.

Who has a more accurate heading? Rolleyes back at you.
 
Same usual press conference coming from Hollande, i appreciate that they are now in a no win situation, because what can he do? Nothing.
 
Have you read the Koran?

Isn't part of the problem that the koran is only part of the doctrine? And so you've got a whole bunch of other texts that different sects consider gospel, and some of those are pretty open to interpretation. And one of those interpretations seems to be, "You can commit atrocities in the name of islam, and you'll be richly rewarded in heaven."

The trouble is, the people who are committing these acts do (possibly) think they are devout, practicing muslims. It's done in the name of their religion. ISIS very much consider themselves muslims, no?

The fact that other muslims disagree, still does not make this anything other than an atrocity committed by self-identifying muslims.

And I really do question how *small* the percentage of muslims prepared to at least justify attacks against the west really is. They seem to be sustaining a campaign of violence which would indicate hundreds if not thousands of sympathisers already in the west.

Then, moving on from terrorist acts, you have things like "honour killings", that don't seem to be prevalent in any other religious group.

Without saying "islam is the problem", you certainly could say "many of these problem groups are muslim". I think that would be fair.
 
ISIS Terrorists Behead Priest in French Church.

Who has a more accurate heading? Rolleyes back at you.

You just earned yourself another 3 rolleyes smillies :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

lets break down your headline

1)ISIS = not confirmed
2)Terrorists = not confirmed
3)Behead = not confirmed
4)Priest in French Church = they covered that bit
 
Which will spawn yet another group and gain the supporters and more importantly rich financial backers in some of the countries in the middle east. Of course had the US/UK not meddled in Iraq/Afghanistan then the problem would be tiny by comparison. Reap what you sow.


Wests fault, check.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom