Brexit thread - what happens next

Status
Not open for further replies.
Anyone know how this high court case over MP's having to approve triggering article 50 will likely go? Does the current law account for this somewhere?

I'd be surprised if it got anywhere. The main argument for the case is that triggering article 50 without asking MPs encroaches on parliamentary sovereignty, which seems a bit odd to me.

Parliament is accountable to the people, and the people have already spoken. Seems backward to seek approval from a group who are supposed to represent another group who have already made their wishes known.

I doubt the Government/PM would be saying what they're saying if they thought there was a good chance the case would succeed.
 
Anyone know how this high court case over MP's having to approve triggering article 50 will likely go? Does the current law account for this somewhere?

No word yet. Both sides seem pretty confident that their interpretation is solid. The court will look at it in October so I don't think we'll know anything before then.
 
Eh? Donald Trump? I'm so bored by the relentless coverage of him by the BBC - I don't know anyone who was persuaded to vote leave by him. The notion seems ridiculous. You'd probably find more people were turned off by Obama.

This was from the Electoral Reform Societies own poll -
The only high-profile figures who, according to the poll, persuaded more voters of their position than drove them to vote the other way were Boris Johnson, Nigel Farage and US presidential candidate Donald Trump, who backed Brexit.
 
Yeah its not a serious suggestion but it eould be interesting.

The EU forving the uk to leave (obviously there would have been no brexit vote with this course) would have been a msssive disaster for the world economy and a huge shock.

Effectively such a shock that the EU could not do it.

Thus, law or not they'd have to work something out, some form of compromise out of self preservation if nothing else.

Is there any actual article that can be invoked to force a member to leave?

Is it also covered somehow under 50?

The normal way issues are dealt with for non conformance is fines, but then you could just not pay them either.
 
Is there any actual article that can be invoked to force a member to leave?

Is it also covered somehow under 50?

The normal way issues are dealt with for non conformance is fines, but then you could just not pay them either.

So after a little digging its looking like the same issue as a member deciding to leave, not well covered.

Article 7 seems to be the one most mentioned, which in effect could suspend all the main functions of the free market etc for an individual member.
In reality I don't even know how that would happen in practice, big chunks of commerce and people movement would practically grind to a halt.
Its designed to handle a massive issue in one member state, such as human rights abuse.
 
So after a little digging its looking like the same issue as a member deciding to leave, not well covered.

Article 7 seems to be the one most mentioned, which in effect could suspend all the main functions of the free market etc for an individual member.
In reality I don't even know how that would happen in practice, big chunks of commerce and people movement would practically grind to a halt.
Its designed to handle a massive issue in one member state, such as human rights abuse.

Well we're about to find out ... voluntarily :D
 
Rather than focussing on the negatives, what positive news is there from the EU - are France and Germany's economies booming for example?
 
I was never 100% about voting leave however that is what I did on the balance of feelings about the EU and the results of an analytic hierarchy process I carried out to prioritise all the seperate criteria. There are obviously many EU positives as there are negatives. The negatives won by a small amount

I am now 100% committed to leaving the EU though and I believe that it will do the UK a great deal of good in the future to not be tied to the EU.
 
Better to be conned into doing something positive than being scared into something negative. ;)

What if it turns out you were conned into doing something negative? At this stage either outcome is possible.

Still at least you admit you were conned, so that's a step forward ;)
 
Of course there is, but Leavers aren't listening so there's little point in explaining anymore. You might as well drop the act of feigned interest.

Really?

I've been reading FT.com and it's all bad news. Can't give you links as you have to pay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom