Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why did Nvidia and AMD stop making double vram versions of their cards? Is it to discourage MGPU?
The 290x an the gtx680 were the last ones offered with the double vram varient wernt they? Im guessing Nvidia stopped doing it the same time they came up with the Titan and they didnt wanna give a cheaper option for those who needed lots of vram so they were stuck buying Titans. AMD i guess were limited to 4gig and couldnt offer an 8 gig option of their Fiji because of HBM.
Maybe they will both starting offering double vram options again just to close this thread
As always having a Vram understanding that more>less doesn't make those I was specifically talking about any lesser thick than they are though does it?
It was an easy choice to make (as a gamer who just wants to game at the end of the day) between GW's shoving it's fist clean up AMD's ability and their own incompetence to get profiles out for mgpu-and that's the titles I was playing, so, better the devil you know for me.
Nv don't really make future proof gpu's, between the specs and dropping support at their choosing and knew that 3.5Gb turbo/.5Gb trotter mode would be ok(ish) until Nv decided you'd need more-leaving me with the option to bend over and pay through the nose for the 970's full fat 8Gb replacement.
You should look closer to home if you want to see thick lmao
well you may know or not that cod since mw2 has had the same vram bug in it.so whats that ten years ? same bug every year.black ops 3 has it.
so thats unoptimized.
new deus ex was same was mainly the drivers. so i not going to argue about buggy games causing the very issues people are using them to highlight vram issues.
You have to be Squeaky clean if you are going to play the moral high ground around here
well you may know or not that cod since mw2 has had the same vram bug in it.so whats that ten years ? same bug every year.black ops 3 has it.
so thats unoptimized.
new deus ex was same was mainly the drivers. so i not going to argue about buggy games causing the very issues people are using them to highlight vram issues.
well i was just saying the games shown were unoptimized.with optimizing the vram limits wouldnt of been pushed.
cod doesnt use anywhere as much vram once they fix the issue after launch.they do it every year since mw2 .
true if you got more vram it helps if a game is unoptimized but what if a game is so unoptimized with a issue you cant buy a card with enough vram to play it ?
is that down to you not having enough vram or a poorly made game ?
when you playing cod and its using 12gb vram at 1080 you know its BS got nothing to do with having enough vram.
^
As we know there are these titles out/coming it's actually another valid reason to cover your back and purchase a higher spec vram gpu in a pp-regardless the vendor.
Agreed.
In it's own right, it's simply an astounding product that cost me>£400 but £70 less than what everywhere else was charging at the time, at the<£400 pp, it's vfm increases dramatically, but, it's a 70 replacement at an 80's pp-wasn't complaining as I obviously bought one-was just saying.
