Hi all, whats your input in this situation.
My aunt (age 64 and a good driver, not a dodgy old fart
) parked up in a town car park for about 30 minutes. She parked in a normal spot with no car either side as it was just the most obvious space.
She returned after a quick run to a shop and drove off normally. The only difference being a large black BMW m3 next to her... she said it was parked normally and plenty of space between them.
Anyway she leaves normally and that is all she remembers.
A week later she gets a phone call from an insurance company saying she was involved in an accident with the BMW and they are claiming for a new front wing and front drivers door/respray. Apparently the BMW driver had "taken photos when he left his car, taking her reg number" just in case anything happened- I guess he was paranoid about his car?.
He returned at the end of the day ( looooong after my aunt had gone ) to find the damage to his car. Now of course to just assume it was her is crazy, his car had been there for half the day but they are chasing her claiming she did it. There is of course no damage to her car, no paint transfer or scuffs.... nothing all round.
She is being bullied to prove it was NOT her... i of course am telling her to tell them to get lost, unless they have evidence.... there is no CCTV in the carpark and no cameras nearby that i can see.
The insurance company who i am now authorised to speak to are saying that he has photo evidence ( only of her parked next to him ) and that she needs to prove that it was not her! i told them to come and inspect her car for damage but they said that she could have had it repaired in the meanwhile and were very dismissive and almost rude, suggesting that she was lying.
Surely to god they cannot make a claim against her with no evidence?
I have told them in no uncertain terms that she fully rejects the claim that she was involved and that unless they have evidence that she was, then to go and take a jump in a river!
We have informed her insurance company who were very helpful and have noted down the facts and agree with me that unless they have evidence then they will also reject the claim should they be approached by his insurance company ( so far they have not ).
Anyway seems to me like a crazy situation all round. Of course i feel sorry for the guy with the damaged car but it was not down to my aunt.
My aunt (age 64 and a good driver, not a dodgy old fart

She returned after a quick run to a shop and drove off normally. The only difference being a large black BMW m3 next to her... she said it was parked normally and plenty of space between them.
Anyway she leaves normally and that is all she remembers.
A week later she gets a phone call from an insurance company saying she was involved in an accident with the BMW and they are claiming for a new front wing and front drivers door/respray. Apparently the BMW driver had "taken photos when he left his car, taking her reg number" just in case anything happened- I guess he was paranoid about his car?.
He returned at the end of the day ( looooong after my aunt had gone ) to find the damage to his car. Now of course to just assume it was her is crazy, his car had been there for half the day but they are chasing her claiming she did it. There is of course no damage to her car, no paint transfer or scuffs.... nothing all round.
She is being bullied to prove it was NOT her... i of course am telling her to tell them to get lost, unless they have evidence.... there is no CCTV in the carpark and no cameras nearby that i can see.
The insurance company who i am now authorised to speak to are saying that he has photo evidence ( only of her parked next to him ) and that she needs to prove that it was not her! i told them to come and inspect her car for damage but they said that she could have had it repaired in the meanwhile and were very dismissive and almost rude, suggesting that she was lying.
Surely to god they cannot make a claim against her with no evidence?
I have told them in no uncertain terms that she fully rejects the claim that she was involved and that unless they have evidence that she was, then to go and take a jump in a river!
We have informed her insurance company who were very helpful and have noted down the facts and agree with me that unless they have evidence then they will also reject the claim should they be approached by his insurance company ( so far they have not ).
Anyway seems to me like a crazy situation all round. Of course i feel sorry for the guy with the damaged car but it was not down to my aunt.
Last edited: