Can't remember if you already discounted it in another thread but what was wrong with a Mondeo? £10k would get a 2012-2013 ecoboost model, probably even one if the higher specs with Nav etc.
i recommend a new wife![]()
whats about mazda CX5?
forget cashcow. the boot is surprisingly small.
Not really mate, if the missus is driving it 80% of the time, then i wouldnt want to force her into buying something she doesnt want...would you force your missus? If you would...i think she needs a new partner!
Surely though, after she has discounted so many cars, there has to be a point at which she has to compromise.
Seems she is dead set on the Qashqai-style "look", at the expensive of some much better cars.
Set your list of priorities and then work on them e.g.
Focus on this first - as this is what you "need"
Again if your budget dictates you need a cheap to run car, then this is a "need". Avoiding "premium" marques, all should be achievable.
Unless you are doing mega miles, then dropping this to 35mpg isn't going to make much difference, and potentially opens up more options
But you aren't driving it for 80% of the time - so you may have to compromise slightly
A Camera isn't a "need", it's a "want". Parking Sensors can be fitted cheaply to any vehicle.
Less of an issue than you imagine - leather wipes clean more easily than cloth, and as long as regularly moisturised is far more resilient to rips than you would imagine (I had 3 kids in my A3 with leather for 3 years - no issues). If you are that worried, then buy seat covers for the rear seats.
A "want" rather than "need", so can be ignored, as you already have a solution (or buy a tomtom etc)
The main issue that needs addressing is the "look"/body style. By discounting saloons and estates (and seemingly favouring "soft-roader 4x4s"), then you are excluding lots of viable cars. Similarly by looking at the 4x4 style you are increasing running costs, as that body style inherently is heavier / less aerodynamic and will increase fuel costs.
If she's driving it for the vast majority of the time and shooting down your suggestions then I'd say it's on her to choose it, not you.
There's a lot of you don't like x, you won't have y which made me think you were the prime driver.
From your response above she is, so for your 20% of the time driving is it right for you to rule something out because it's French? Or a bit ugly?
A3 and Leon arent big enough and an Octavia is a Saloon or Estate...so none of these are contenders :-/
is it right for you to rule something out because it's French
Its an Estate...not looking at Estates![]()
You said your complaint with them was the head space, not that they weren't big enough. Maybe I missed it but I don't recall you saying a saloon wasn't an option. An Octavia is technically a large hatchback too![]()
Yes
I do see where the OP is coming from in that if he's not going to be driving it 80% of the time then ultimately it should be something that she likes, but that doesn't mean that I personally wouldn't put my foot down somewhat if she chose something crap.
If I had to choose something of this ilk, I'd go for a Mazda CX5 probably, certainly over a Qashquai, Mitsubishi ASX (I think these are awful), or anything Korean. It's supposedly very good. But I'd always pick a decent sized estate - more spacious and nicer to drive.
Kia's actually use Hyundai engineering, not the other way round. Hyundai is the dad, Kia is the child.
Why? Elaborate please![]()
First off because it's classed as an estate and you're not allowed one of those.
Secondly even when it was launched in 2009 it used a platform that was already 5 years old - something that is now 12 years old (the platform happens to be the 3 series estate, that word again!).
The interior is distinctly meh, again it's based on a car from 2004.
It can't park on a grass verge. Was renowned by owners for rough suspension, particularly in M-Sport guise and the 2 liter diesel in it is known for it's very expensive timing chain failures.
Oh and looks like a foot.