I don't understand racism or homophobia

Manchester next weekend. Pair of you. To ease you in I'll take you to a tranny bar first.

.then later the black egale mens only club, wear leather. Its basicaly the blue oyster from police academy.


They do have a glass booth on a pedestal you can dance in under a sprinkler though.
 
Tefal said:
Your the one beliving it without any evidence yet you dont believe in the very well researched and document problem of chem sex and unprotected sex in the gay community.


That shows you are very bias.

You will happily belive bad things about striaght men but not about gay men .
Click to expand...

You're misinterpreting/convoluting what I said. I don't deny any of that happens, in any circles of people. I don't think being gay is a cause though. Just like being black is a cause of being a murderer. So by quoting whatever 'stats' we like, it's not relevant. I can find stats in any things and throw them out there and make daft claims.

Lets roll back to the point made: statistically black people are more likely to murder/be murdered. What does that even mean? I know what it does mean for some, it means they form silly prejudices about black people based on one daft stat! It makes people talk like "oh, they do that BECAUSE they are black". Stats like that are damaging because they are disingenuous.
 
Tefal said:
Manchester next weekend. Pair of you. To ease you in I'll take you to a tranny bar first.

.then later the black egale mens only club, wear leather. Its basicaly the blue oyster from police academy.


They do have a glass booth on a pedestal you can dance in under a sprinkler though.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't want to upstage you though :(
 
peterwalkley said:
Ignorance
Click to expand...

This really. Pure ignorance and complete lack of insight into true causality.

People, even retards, like to define the causes of things. But because certain people are too retarded to analyse things with deeper logical insight, they simply identify basic low level factors like skin colour as the causal factor, and this creates self-gratification because they think they've nailed/understood something.

I really don't understand people who say blacks are more criminal. It's just such a disgusting thing to say. I've met and know many real black people straight from Africa and they are some of the most harmless and friendly people I've ever met!
 
Last edited:
ScoTTyBEEE said:
I guess there's little point in ever doing statistics if they can be debunked with 2 simple words every time.
Click to expand...

Depends how good the science is. A good study would use epistemological techniques to assess which factors/variables contribute causally, and by how much, and which don't, where possible given the available data.
 
asim18 said:
This really. Pure ignorance and complete lack of insight into true causality.

People, even retards, like to define the causes of things. But because certain people are too retarded to analyse things with deeper logical insight, they simply identify basic low level factors like skin colour as the causal factor, and this creates self-gratification because they think they've nailed/understood something.

I really don't understand people who say blacks are more criminal. It's just such a disgusting thing to say. I've met and know many real black people straight from Africa and they are some of the most harmless and friendly people I've ever met!
Click to expand...

Why are African crime rates so.high then?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...untry-at-war-as-rate-soars-to-nearly-49-a-day
Click to expand...
 
The Running Man said:
Why are African crime rates so.high then?
Click to expand...


Hahaha. My post has been completely validated.

Just focus on these two words from your post "Why" and "then". "Why then?".

You want to know why crime is high, you want to attribute it to something yet you are also unable to properly investigate all the factors, of which there are thousands. Is skin colour really the only thing you can identify?

I suggest you read the following Wikipedia articles before you delude yourself into thinking you have some sort of criminologically derived understanding of crime in Africa.

Illusory Correlation

Correlation does not imply causation
 
Last edited:
The Running Man said:
How does murdering someone change that?

Also go here and sirt the table by murder rate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate

Isn't india a poor country? Yet it has 1/10th the murder rate than S.A....
Click to expand...

So if a brown Indian murders someone for raping his sister, and a Black African does the same also because someone raped his sister, you automatically assume the black person didn't do it for his sister, but only did it because he's black.

Disgusting. But that's what is honestly in your head isn't it? You're ignorant to individual causal factors and blindly follow your illusory correlation.
 
Last edited:
asim18 said:
So if a brown Indian murders someone for raping his sister, and a Black African does the same also because someone raped his sister, you automatically assume the black person didn't do it for his sister, but only did it because he's black.

Disgusting. But that's what is honestly in your head isn't it? You're ignorant to individual causal factors and blindly follow your illusory correlation.
Click to expand...

Can you explain the rates then? We are looking at large pools of data aggregated not individual cases.

If you refuse to acknowledge the issues you can't fix them unfortunately. Places like Bangladesh have a much smaller homicide rate than S. Africa. Can you explain why this is?

Linking it to skin colour doesnt work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom