that is a pretty naive way of using statistics... perhaps consider the prior here
So, a right wing fascist then? Since the last attack was the murder of Jo Cox....
that is a pretty naive way of using statistics... perhaps consider the prior here
how so?
i dont think people deny Islamic terrorism exists so your just being stupid
No it isnt, there are plenty done by others too, all the usual suspects jumped to the same conclusion over the attack at the Dusseldorf train station (you included iirc) but it turned out to be a eastern European guy.
sorry but that is an outrageous accusation, Islam is a peaceful religion
if they do turn out to be supposed 'muslims' then it will clearly be down to mental health or alcohol/weed and nothing ideological at all
So, a right wing fascist then? Since the last attack was the murder of Jo Cox....
You mean the asylum seeker from the majority Muslim country in southern Europe? Not the best counter-point.
Even if it hasn't been confirmed it would be a brave man that bets against this being Islamic terrorism.
You mean like how Joe Cox's murder wasn't motivated by right wing hatred? C'mon man the facts will come out it just doesn't serve any agenda to release information till the big picture is understood.
What does calling a spade a spade achieve anyway? How are you progressing our knowledge/understanding/solution by doing so?some individuals on GD seem to think the world smells of roses and that you cant call a spade a spade, even when its right in front of their eyes.
I don't condone automatically assuming that assailants in incidents such as this are Islamic, but to say that if they are then it is more likely to be down to alcohol/weed than them sharing the views of certain terrorist organisations is a bit delusional in the current climate I feel...
Nobody mows down people in a car and then goes on a stabbing spree because they are high or drunk...
"Being treated as a terrorist incident"