Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Sep 2013
- Posts
- 12,803
I think I mentioned elsewhere - If electric vehicles were all that and diesel was such a problem, the military would have already developed über-fancy electric tanks by now!
Diesel buses ARE a big problem, which is why London is getting rid of them.
And replacing them with...?
Why does nobody care about the central heating systems responsible for a THIRD of Central London NOX emissions?
Why has nobody pointed out that petrol cars are responsible for 7% of the Central London NOX emissions? Diesel cars are worse - but represent 11% in the same figures.
Petrol isn't a breathe easy utopia either which is why the ULEZ zone applies to them, too.
And replacing them with...?
Why does nobody care about the central heating systems responsible for a THIRD of Central London NOX emissions?
Why has nobody pointed out that petrol cars are responsible for 7% of the Central London NOX emissions? Diesel cars are worse - but represent 11% in the same figures.
Petrol isn't a breathe easy utopia either which is why the ULEZ zone applies to them, too.
Quite a few or the are already electric
And replacing them with...?
Why does nobody care about the central heating systems responsible for a THIRD of Central London NOX emissions?
Why has nobody pointed out that petrol cars are responsible for 7% of the Central London NOX emissions? Diesel cars are worse - but represent 11% in the same figures.
Petrol isn't a breathe easy utopia either which is why the ULEZ zone applies to them, too.
Then diesel cars will most likely be banned, like they are in some European city centres.
Can't speak for all manufacturers, but MAN group have been heavily funding CNG powered vehicles for a number of years.And replacing them with...?
Electric motors tend to have fairly poor torque outputs. Not all that good for 60 tonne tanks...I think I mentioned elsewhere - If electric vehicles were all that and diesel was such a problem, the military would have already developed über-fancy electric tanks by now!
Paris has a ban, as does Stuttgart I think.
Electric motors tend to have fairly poor torque outputs. Not all that good for 60 tonne tanks...
The electric motors they're putting in EVs have plenty of torque, and they deliver max torque from a standing start which would actually be perfect for a tank. E.g. a Nissan Leaf has 250 Nm of torque which is more than a Ford Focus, and it can put it down on demand.
The question about electric military vehicles is a weird one (it's nothing to do with electric vs diesel, it's about logistics and refuelling)
The torque of a family car is very different to that of a larger vehicleThe electric motors they're putting in EVs have plenty of torque, and they deliver max torque from a standing start which would actually be perfect for a tank. E.g. a Nissan Leaf has 250 Nm of torque which is more than a Ford Focus, and it can put it down on demand.
The question about electric military vehicles is a weird one (it's nothing to do with electric vs diesel, it's about logistics and refuelling)
top of the range tesla model S has nearly 900 ft-lb of torque
top of the range tesla model S has nearly 900 ft-lb of torque
Bingo. That's why large vehicles use diesel..A top of the range Scania V8 has 2581 ft-lb of torque and emissions similar to a family hatchback huge service intervals and a proven driveline.
It'll be a good while before we see electric commercials be it trucks or buses , we're they viable they'd already be making inroads, they aren't.
Modem Diesel engines are not the big polluter these days, quite the opposite in fact.