Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Posts
- 11,698
- Location
- Surrey
Why should their be any risk? If its a reputable seller surely they can prove the digital content was sent.
Can they prove that the codes were used by the buyer?
As i said, its clear that the seller has no protection prior to the sale. They set the terms, you can't decide to go against their terms and expect a payout if it goes wrong even if it is out of your control. I am not saying it is OPs fault, i am just saying PP are not obliged to pay the seller. The buyer's are protected under their agreement and so have a right to the refund in this scenario depending on whose fault the hacking was. Yes it is unfair but it is not deception on PP part.
that might be fair if there was some other issue like disputing the delivery of said goods - however the issue in this case is the buyer's accounts were hacked - surely that is an issue for PayPal or the buyer
The fact is that if another person had access to these buyers ebay accounts due to buyer negligence and the delivery method used is one that forfeits your seller protection by paypal and ebay, then Paypal in theory dont have to pay anyone back. Reality is that it is hard to prove it was down to the buyer's negligence (phishing scams or whatever) and much easier to dodge the seller's complaints due to their terms on conditions.
Not saying it is fair, just saying how it is. Yeah if you kicked up enough fuss eventually you might get somewhere but whether that is worth OPs £90 is another matter.