You would be surprised by how few in the homosexual community actually perform anal sex.. the number is similar to that in the heterosexual community. The majority of the "love making" is focused primarily on foreplay.
Are gay folks getting too much attention?
- Thread starter Diddums
- Start date
- Status
You would be surprised by how few in the homosexual community actually perform anal sex.. the number is similar to that in the heterosexual community. The majority of the "love making" is focused primarily on foreplay.
But what has overpopulation got to do with being gay?
Are you saying being gay is the solution to overcrowding?
But if people are born gay, it cant be a solution can it because I cant suddenly choose to be gay right?
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Overpopulation has nothing to do with being gay, not even sure why you made that link.
You were trying to say that the meaning of life is to further the species. Doing so is putting the world dangerously close to overpopulation and everything associated with it.
You were trying to say that the meaning of life is to further the species. Doing so is putting the world dangerously close to overpopulation and everything associated with it.
Seriously?
dehumanize
diːˈhjuːm(ə)nʌɪz/
verb
past tense: dehumanised; past participle: dehumanised
- deprive of positive human qualities.
So you are saying I have deprived them of their ability to have children??
You have no idea of cause and effect I'm afraid. I haven't deprived anyone of anything. Blame god or genetics lol.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
No you are depriving them of their humanity because you think god says the meaning of life is to have kids.
No I can assure you I am very much a non-theist.
Life itself dictates that the meaning of life is to have kids. Otherwise there would be no life, let alone such a diverse range of sexual attraction to various things. If our parents didn't reproduce we simply wouldn't exist lol.
Consigliere
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2004
- Posts
- 151,034
- Location
- SW17
I expect them to be grateful their activities are now legal over a certain age and STFU to be honestI personally wouldn't let them have all this marriage nonsense and tax rights, but even then they'll whine. And don't tell me they wouldn't parade, the ones on these tawdry jaunts are there for the posing or the hope of casual sexual encounters, ask the road cleaners who have to sort out their hazardous detritus after an event.
How have you survived on here since 2003?
Fingers crossed you get a bit of karma in a special way - who knows, you'd probably like it. Then it would be awkward for you...
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Why are you so hung up on procreation as a means to further the species. Religion is a construct to give people meaning, marriage is a social construct to keep mates together long enough to ensure the development and survival of their offspring.
Gay or straight I don't want kids, so my bloodline ends with me, big deal? If I enjoy my life and don't affect anyone in a negative way who are you to say thats not the meaning of my life.
Honestly I'm tired or hearing this argument that the purpose of life is to reproduce and that you're somehow a lesser being if you don't because you haven't fulfilled your 'purpose'.
Reproducing is NOT the purpose or meaning of life. It's simply the nature of life. It's what life does as a biological mechanism. There is no meaning or purpose in it.
Honestly it's not even 'necessary' that we reproduce either. There is literally no reason why we NEED to exist.
Reproducing is NOT the purpose or meaning of life. It's simply the nature of life. It's what life does as a biological mechanism. There is no meaning or purpose in it.
Honestly it's not even 'necessary' that we reproduce either. There is literally no reason why we NEED to exist.
You are confusing things..
People say the meaning of life is to reproduce because otherwise there is no "reason"
As biological organisms if we fail to pass on our DNA we have technically failed as a life-form.. Therefore the ONLY meaning or "nature" as you say... regardless of semantics, is to reproduce..
Sorry mate, if you don't/can't have kids, your not human.
lol Just goes to show your mentality.
We've gone from a definitive reproduction as a "life process", to "dehumanising" and now completely "not human".
lol. people just cant stay rational can they.
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Someone questioned if not being able to reproduce means they are lesser humans and you went off on one about how reproduction is fundamental for the survival of the species then someone else says I am biological dead weight because I don't want to pass my DNA on. You are the one not being rational.
I don't think you know what rationality is.
Reproduction is fundamental for the survival of any species. It's not irrational to know nor state it. You simply wouldn't exist if it wasn't for heterosexual reproduction. The idea is based on 100% rational thought not based on any emotional personal predisposition to homosex.
If you survive for 70 years as a homosexual it's not the same thing as a "species". One life is completely and utterly insignificant in the grand scheme of an entire species.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 25 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,386
- Location
- Darwen
Forget it.
Then it has naff all to do with an individual being gay and you have just gone off on some sort of weird tangent.
But you're the one going off on tangeants and avoiding the point:
You've gone from a definitive reproduction as a "life process", to "dehumanising" and now completely "not human".
lol calls a debate retarded and then proceeds to plant the seed for even more retarded debate.
It's simply not possible for a offspring to be conceived with homosex.
Was there any meaning to Isaac Newton's life?
- Status