That's my point - she's essentially rented the house cheaply and also gained the amount the property has gone up in value. Both scenarios leave you without a property at the end, I hadn't missed that.
Also if she didn't have the interest only loan the repayments would have been much higher. Where has all the money gone from not making these payments? Most likely she was living beyond her means in the first place. No sympathy can be had for the short sightedness in this case, especially with all that equity that has built up.
True enough, but still, having a chunky backup is still far better than having nothing there.
Pay £500k to who?
Don't you just sell the house at the end, pay off the balance (the initial purchase price) and keep what's left?
So the TLDR is she rented the house?
So apparently one fifth of all mortgages are interest only, which is 1.9 million people seemingly and a lot of them aren't touching their debt at all...
I think so. I think house prices one day will take a massive hit too. Interest rates rises, a possible recession due to Brexit, people defaulting. It's only been helped along now by the extremely low interest rateChances of another big crash before the end of the decade. Pretty likely I reckon.
£70,000 over 10 years in just interest. However that's under £600 a month for a £550,000 property, probably cheaper than renting, plus you're also up however much the value of the property has gone up.
Am I being stupid or does it not actually sound that awful a deal?
they bought the house for £180K so interest is charged on that not the price it is now.
it's a stupid article they have made over £370k in profit on the value. they could quite easily sell the house and move elsewhere. effectively her son still has £370K inheritance as they only owe the bank £180K yet house is worth over £550K.
they are idiots to even be complaining
It's not stupid if you want to live in London, that £370K will get you a cardboard box for all it's worth.
£410K will get you a large brand new build 5 bedroom house in an affluent area in Glasgow.
boohoo, they would need to take out a mortgage of £40K to do so.
absolutely stupid article with stupid people in it. they could have you know taken out a normal mortgage but now they want to milk it
Aren't buy to let mortgages interest only? Or did I dream that?