I was comparing the prices and quality from Sainsburys, Tesco and Waitrose. And judging from your last quote it seems you're struggling with what I originally said. So I'm going to end the discussion on this point rather than continuing correcting you.
This is what you said.
Actually, the butcher shown in the above picture has free range chicken that's cheaper and tastier than the large Sainsbury superstore up the road. In fact, I was talking to someone from the Ginger Pig who confirmed that the supermarket meat price is ridiculous for what it is.
So your evidence for the varying quality at supermarkets and independents is someone that works in an independent?
Basically, I feel most of supermarket meat tend to be bland compared to the butchers. Also pricing from the butchers are generally cheaper in my experience. So no, I don't agree with you.
And I feel that meat from a decent supermarket (and I class Waitrose as one, at least on the meat side of the spectrum) is just as good as from a butcher, like for like, while still being cheaper.
Not every supermarket is the same though, I've not had as much success with meat from say Tesco or Asda.
We shall have to agree to disagree here. Your feeling/experience is obviously different to mine.
Of course Supermarkets is out there to make a profit but the point I was making is that their buying power is fuelling their profits rather than giving the consumer a cheaper product.
The romantic view of local independents vs the evil supermarkets is your unhelpful view of the situation. I suggest throw in local economics and the fact that big businesses have loads of idiots working for them then suddenly there is no such thing as a romantic view.
And my point was that a local butcher is there to make a profit, just as the supermarket is. Both are businesses aiming to persuade customers to buy from them. Both want to portray an image to do that.
You appear to be expressing quite clearly that an independent is going to be better than a supermarket. My point is that things are variable, some supermarkets are better than others, some independents are better than others, some supermarkets are better than some independents and some independents are better than some supermarkets. The claim however that you appear to be making - an independent is inherently better than a supermarket - is false IMO and a romantic view of the situation (backed up by your last sentence IMO).
The local economics mean an independent has less buying power than a supermarket chain, and may have overheads. They don't really say much at all about cost, but it generally meams they can't compete on price, one of the reasons so many have gone under over the last 20 years.