Concerns that roads are being designed to INCREASE danger and accidents.

Another day, another wacko conspiracy theory by Asim. Have you ever thought that you may need to seek professional psychiatric help? Or will they do nothing but plant a chip in your head to control your mind?
 
No, I'm not trolling, I am using some hyperbole.

If you actually read the examples in the thread you would understand why I posted that at the start of the post.....

In your OP, you without experience or qualifications are in your words 'convinced beyond reasonable doubt that; roads are being redesigned in order to increase accident rates and endanger human life'

Not even that the contractors or designers may get it wrong or that it is just poor design but you are convinced beyond reasonable doubt it is being done on purpose to increase accident rates and endanger human life.

So yes, my point still stands.
 
Yes of course. When they repair potholes they must do a pretty poor job as they are back within the year.

Most major roads I travel on now have all the street lights turned off. Traveling down the A1 a few weeks ago in the rain I couldn't see two feet in front of me.

It's either incompetence or by design.
 
Another day, another wacko conspiracy theory by Asim. Have you ever thought that you may need to seek professional psychiatric help? Or will they do nothing but plant a chip in your head to control your mind?
Yet many things I have theorised in the past, even as far back as 5 years ago, have actually ended up occurring. So I must be the whack job in need of psychiatric help. Excellent logic there.


Anyway nice of some people to completely miss the point of **** road works going on and latch onto a notion that it may be being done on purpose lmao. :D
 
Yet many things I have theorised in the past, even as far back as 5 years ago, have actually ended up occurring. So I must be the whack job in need of psychiatric help. Excellent logic there.


Anyway nice of some people to completely miss the point of **** road works going on and latch onto a notion that it may be being done on purpose lmao. :D

Of they will latch onto that its the first thing you said in the OP?
 
In your OP, you without experience or qualifications are in your words 'convinced beyond reasonable doubt that; roads are being redesigned in order to increase accident rates and endanger human life'

Not even that the contractors or designers may get it wrong or that it is just poor design but you are convinced beyond reasonable doubt it is being done on purpose to increase accident rates and endanger human life.

So yes, my point still stands.

You never had any point whatsoever. You had a troll post that's all.

If you wanted to make a point you should simply state "no it's not being done on purpose" and that would be a point. But yeah lets forget about the crap roads and focus on 2 lines trying to point out that something this silly cant be an accident. You're coming across as a council employee lmao, trying to divert the issue. :D

What you posted was a troll post.

Also, way to start whining about "points" being made when you have completely missed the point of the actual thread (which is crap roads) not the Illuminati, and have decided to latch and continue to latch onto the notion that it's all a conspiracy lol.
 
Why on earth would someone make the roads mute dangerous on purpose? How many people are in on this conspiracy to make it viable?
 
@asim18

I agree 100% that some roads are being stupidly redesigned and can cause accidents but it's going a bit far to say you are convinced they are doing it on purpose to cause accidents.
 
Firstly most people will be unaware that this is happening but after what I saw last night I am convinced beyond reasonable doubt that; roads are being redesigned in order to increase accident rates and endanger human life....

Just quoting you again to remind you how specific and adamant you were that it's all a conspiracy.
 
I was going to read the full OP, then I saw it was made by asim and the thread title suddenly made sense, so I didn't bother with the rest. Must have removed his tin foil hat to use it for some drugs.
 
Just quoting you again to remind you how specific and adamant you were that it's all a conspiracy.

Are you still whining about that? Even though I have said absolutely nothing to reinforce any sort of conspiracy theory, and have actually explained why I said those lines? It's because it's beggars belief.

You're still intent on latching onto something I've already clarified.

You made a troll post and I identified your troll post, now stop whining about "your point" because SexyGreyFox has managed to make exactly the same point you wanted to, without coming across as a complete and utter troll.
 
I was going to read the full OP, then I saw it was made by asim and the thread title suddenly made sense, so I didn't bother with the rest. Must have removed his tin foil hat to use it for some drugs.


"Ignorance is bliss" in action here. Wow. I love this forum.

You're completely ignoring 4 examples of serious/potentially deadly things, just because it's "asim" that's raising the awareness!

Just textbook ignorance.

Beautiful. Thank you.
 
Are you still whining about that? Even though I have said absolutely nothing to reinforce any sort of conspiracy theory, and have actually explained why I said those lines? It's because it's beggars belief.

You're still intent on latching onto something I've already clarified.

You made a troll post and I identified your troll post, now stop whining about "your point" because SexyGreyFox has managed to make exactly the same point you wanted to, without coming across as a complete and utter troll.

Wasn't trolling, was actually calling you stupid. Well did question whether you were trolling or stupid but you've played your hand so definitely convinced now.
 
Wasn't trolling, was actually calling you stupid. Well did question whether you were trolling or stupid but you've played your hand so definitely convinced now.

Still have no idea what you're whining about. No, I don't actually have evidence to suggest that someone intended for there to be 2 lamp posts in a cycle lane in order to fulfil psychopathic tendencies. The notion was put forth because 2 lamp posts in the middle of a bike lane has beggared my belief.

Not sure how much clearer I can make this. No doubt we will have another post soon whining about something while doing your best to detract from the actual issue at hand here, which is crap road work.

Truly amazing. Thanks once again.
 
Thread of the year.

Asim you are totally right and everyone else is wrong/mental.

Firstly most people will be unaware that this is happening but after what I saw last night I am convinced beyond reasonable doubt that; roads are being redesigned in order to increase accident rates and endanger human life.

My concerns first came to fruition almost a decade ago when they resurfaced the road I live on.

Just quoting this to ensure indefinite lols.
 
So are we essentially playing the mental health card?

Someone designs a cycle lane through 2 lamp posts and we're saying there's nothing to see here because the person in charge is stupid/mental issues?

I think your mistake is is assuming there was any design involved. Or, more accurately, any design related to functionality. Or that a person is in charge of the big picture, or that anyone even knows what the big picture is.

My interpretation is that it's mess of decisions by different people and that the people making each decision knew very little about any the one part they were deciding on and nothing about the whole picture and that the people who implement the decisions will have no voice in the matter. Centre line not in the centre? Street lights in an obviously wrong place? Well, that's where the orders say to put them. Orders from someone who's never been there and has no real clue about the situation, but orders none the less. So they have to be obeyed - the people who do the work are paid to obey orders, not to question them.
 
I think your mistake is is assuming there was any design involved. Or, more accurately, any design related to functionality. Or that a person is in charge of the big picture, or that anyone even knows what the big picture is.

My interpretation is that it's mess of decisions by different people and that the people making each decision knew very little about any the one part they were deciding on and nothing about the whole picture and that the people who implement the decisions will have no voice in the matter. Centre line not in the centre? Street lights in an obviously wrong place? Well, that's where the orders say to put them. Orders from someone who's never been there and has no real clue about the situation, but orders none the less. So they have to be obeyed - the people who do the work are paid to obey orders, not to question them.

Totally accurate and your post cam be summed up in 2 words.


Council planning.
 
here's a question for you asim, if we're running with your premise that these alterations are indeed deliberate attempts to make the roads more dangerous, then there's one important point missing from your accusation of the council:

what's the motive? what do they gain from making the roads more dangerous? what's in it for them?
 
Back
Top Bottom