• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Star Wars Battlefront 2 Benchmarks

heartburnron said:
I thought it was only the multi-player part of the game available through Origin early access. Could you potentially go through the whole campaign then? Is it the usual 10 hours of play permitted?
Click to expand...
Yes 10 hours to play it as much as you like. Probably enough time to finish the campaign and try a bit of multiplayer.
 
V F said:
I only see one green card beating two reds? Looks good to me. It isn’t as if the red cards are 20 odd fps behind the green one.

Even 8fps ahead isn’t something to boast about. Nor is it running away with the competition. 8 fps I mean really. Riveting.
Click to expand...

Are you only looking at the bench that AMDmatt posted? (Clue in his username;))

The other benches show a very different story. As per usual on here we get the obscure foreign click bait sites used as ‘proof’ and then it all goes south for AMD when either credible benchmarks are shown or nvidia launch a driver.

I think it’s quite disingenuous that AMD feel the need (assuming they are aware of Matts actions?) to seek out the more obscure benches that favour them and post them up.

At best this is misinformation.

Fortunately we don’t have an nvidia rep doing the same as it would be very vulgar!
 
Last edited:
Gregster said:

Playing very nicely on the 3 cards tested.
Click to expand...

Anyone else notice in that video how any scene with static movement and no effects the rx vega is 20-25 fps ahead of the 1080 but soon as you introduce movement or any kind of effect (fire for example) vega Dumps and the gap gets smaller and is only 5-8 fps?

Watched it twice and seems to be quite consistent.
 
enigma27 said:
You can't finish the campaign in the trial it's locked to 3 missions. You only got the full campaign of you have pre ordered
Click to expand...
Oh, I've only played the first two missions so assumed you could complete the game.

Brazo said:
Are you only looking at the bench that AMDmatt posted? (Clue in his username;))

The other benches show a very different story. As per usual on here we get the obscure foreign click bait sites used as ‘proof’ and then it all goes south for AMD when either credible benchmarks are shown or nvidia launch a driver.

I think it’s quite disingenuous that AMD feel the need (assuming they are aware of Matts actions?) to seek out the more obscure benches that favour them and post them up.

At best this is misinformation.

Fortunately we don’t have an nvidia rep doing the same as it would be very vulgar!
Click to expand...

Lighten up mate, i am free to post benchmark results whether i work for AMD or not.
 
Brazo said:
You are yes but don’t be surprised if people pick you up on their accuracy or your intentions.
Click to expand...
I suggest taking it up with the people that run the benchmarks if you feel they are inaccurate.

Gregster said:

Playing very nicely on the 3 cards tested.
Click to expand...
enigma27 said:
Anyone else notice in that video how any scene with static movement and no effects the rx vega is 20-25 fps ahead of the 1080 but soon as you introduce movement or any kind of effect (fire for example) vega Dumps and the gap gets smaller and is only 5-8 fps?

Watched it twice and seems to be quite consistent.
Click to expand...

Game is nicely optimised.

We'll put out a driver to improve performance near game launch.
 
JediFragger said:
Tbf, considering AMD have a fraction of the budget nVidia have I don't think they're doing too badly at all :)

Hell, with a bigger driver team I bet it'd be better!!
Click to expand...
Agreed Si. Good to see both teams doing well and I quite enjoy seeing Vega taking the lead from time to time (Wolfenstein for example) :D
 
Brazo said:
Are you only looking at the bench that AMDmatt posted? (Clue in his username;))

The other benches show a very different story. As per usual on here we get the obscure foreign click bait sites used as ‘proof’ and then it all goes south for AMD when either credible benchmarks are shown or nvidia launch a driver.

I think it’s quite disingenuous that AMD feel the need (assuming they are aware of Matts actions?) to seek out the more obscure benches that favour them and post them up.

At best this is misinformation.

Fortunately we don’t have an nvidia rep doing the same as it would be very vulgar!
Click to expand...
Matt is just trying to show his companies product in the best light possible why is that such a big deal to you? You should relax, calm down or just get out more it's just a benchmark.
 
Freddie1980 said:
Matt is just trying to show his companies product in the best light possible why is that such a big deal to you? You should relax, calm down or just get out more it's just a benchmark.
Click to expand...
It’s a cherry picked benchmark. I’m just highlighting that there are others which show different results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom