Whereas this is perfectly fine and celebrated all over Twitter:
That's racist, where are the white black women!?
LA times and their all white women cover
- Thread starter dowie
- Start date
That's racist, where are the white black women!?
What about the red cheeks and caramels. We gotta take this down to the race-feature racism level.
I'm still confused about why the adjective 'poweful' often gets bandied about when describing projects like this....
Was the photoshoot conducted in secret under an oppressive regime which either openly or tacitly forbade the depiction, in photo, of a group of black women?
What's 'poweful' about it exactly? Western media is hardly devoid of other depictions of black women (often in a state of partial undress)
The only explanation that makes sense to me is the one that goes that all of these 'equality' movements are not, at their core, concerned with equality but rather obsessed obtaining power for a perceived group of disadvantaged people regardless of the merit in a Marxist style over throw of a perceived oppressor class
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2012
- Posts
- 2,332
Oh no that just won't do. These women's lib pieces should be part financed by the tax payer as they are important cultural enrichment programs. Men who purchase any of these "important artworks" should willingly pay double the market value, quadruple if they are white males, as part of their reparations towards women.
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2012
- Posts
- 2,332
Naa, redknecks are some of the most unhinged, dangerous people I've ever seen. All of them are in possession of a small arsenal of weapons. They're regularly capable of massacring the entire population of a high school or concert venue.
I think they know who to target first too. It isn't the blacks or the Hispanics, they'll go straight for the whites who they see as traitors.
You may have a point...
... coastal dwelling American 'progressive' types don't tend to be the more heavily armed individuals in the USA
Associate
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2012
- Posts
- 2,332
There are no black people because it isn't an identity parade at an American police station
Of course they are, it's about X group trying to push their own agenda on everyone else. Anyone with any sense can see it. The problem is the media doesn't tell them to get lost and plays along with it.
It's pronounced Sash-ah (like Sasha). So the name isn't stupid, just the spelling. I wouldn't kick her out of bed for dodgy spelling.
But eating biscuits in bed?
Yeah, not allowed. You end up finding the crumbs stuck in all the nooks and crannies for days. You're not an animal Saoirse, you don't eat in bed.
This reminded me of a Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse sketch....
But what if Saoirse left biscuit crumbs in the bed?.....
I would say Saoirse... NO! you may be able to get away with an unpronounceable name but you do not get to leave biscuit crumbs in the bed!
Now move your derriere out of this bed pronto!
where did you get that it was pronounced like Sash-ah?
as already posted it's more like seer-sha. although there are regional variations where the pronunciation will be more like sawr-sha.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,224
I've heard it pronounced as "Sasha", but if she pronounces it "Seersha", then "Seersha" it is. She still won't be eating chocolate hob-nobs in my bed.