And equally - the kid retrieving his ball is not guilty of theft for retrieving his football.
Quite
And equally - the kid retrieving his ball is not guilty of theft for retrieving his football.
Gardens are regarded differently to inside spaces.And equally - the kid retrieving his ball is not guilty of theft for retrieving his football.
Not in the eyes of the law as the DDA removed the necessity to keep your dog under control in just a public place - this now covers within your home as well
Not a hope in hell of winning that claim.She hasn't got a hope in hell of winning this claim.
Counter-sue for trespass.
That doesn't apply to this case however.
https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q524.htm
The 'inside the home' is for visitors and other occupants' protection
That doesn't apply to this case however.
https://www.askthe.police.uk/content/Q524.htm
The 'inside the home' is for visitors and other occupants' protection
For example if you deliberately set your dog onto the intruder and they then suffer injury, you may be liable for prosecution
Complete joke!..
Fact is, she's a moron for trying to retrieve the letter, I would knock on the door and/or post a note explaining that you put something through by accident and to post it through next door.Not a hope in hell of winning that claim.
Nah that's reasonable. You're only allowed to use reasonable force in self defense. Setting your dog to attack is beyond that.
As usual, peoples "opinion" on this matter (which is worthless) and the actual law (which is the important bit) are two different things.
Dogs biting peoples hands through the letterbox is covered in the Dangerous Dogs Act 2014 - Which now applies to all breeds from a Rottweiler to a chihuahua - and it's not limited to RM workers
https://www.pets4homes.co.uk/pet-ad...ct-2014-what-all-dog-owners-need-to-know.html
Well if it didn't bite her when posting the letter, and only nipped her when her arm was through the letter box - I would think the court may see that differently
Well if it didn't bite her when posting the letter, and only nipped her when her arm was through the letter box - I would think the court may rule in the home owners favour.
"may" being the operative word. What she was doing wasn't unreasonable really.
no, but if this is deemed as acceptable, reasonable behaviour, then whats to stop toerags posting the "wrong letter" in your letter box then having a rummage round to see if theres anything worth nicking.
Cats would just run away.See, you'd never find a cat doing this...cats > mutts.
Nothing I guess (I love when GD stretches scenarios to breaking point)but I'm not sure what you have worth knicking that is a) within reach of your letterbox and b) would fit though it
![]()