78 year old pensioner arrested for for stabbing burglar (burglar later died in hospital)

Status
Not open for further replies.
and how do you know its a break in, drunk people have gone to the wrong house, delivery people have opened doors to drop parcels in, builders have got wrong address, you sentence all these people to death for no reason.

eh? how many drunk people force someone into their kitchen after threatening them with a screwdriver? How does that happen by accident?
 
eh? how many drunk people force someone into their kitchen after threatening them with a screwdriver? How does that happen by accident?
and what you said has what to do with any off what was said before?
clue it isnt. re-read what he said and what it would open up. not once did he say anything like reasonable force. Just a blanket right to kill any intruder.
 
lets be glad you aren't in charge.
and how do you know its a break in, drunk people have gone to the wrong house, delivery people have opened doors to drop parcels in, builders have got wrong address, you sentence all these people to death for no reason.
vigilante justice is not good in anyway. Which is why we don't allow what you suggest and nor should we.

oh office this person I know broke in so I killed them, yeah thats fine. except you invited them in and kept that from police.

An absolutely ridicules way of thinking

Brilliant.

Sorry officer, I was just accidentally delivering a parcel, with a screwdriver, in the middle of the night?

Way to go out of context.
 
Completely understand and agree he should be arrested whilst it is investigated. Good on him for taking him out too.
 
Brilliant.

Sorry officer, I was just accidentally delivering a parcel, with a screwdriver?

Way to go out of context.
where did your post say anything about a screwdrive, or reasonable force or threat? It didn't. It is not out of context at all. It is very much in context with what you wrote.
 
and what? The post is self explanatory, I don't need you to explain that the man later died in hospital. The claim was made that he was arrested because the person died, well the person died later.. he was arrested as a result of the stabbing.
A stabbing in which a man died. The when and where doesn't matter if the person died as a direct result of injuries sustained when he was stabbed and as such has no baring on how the person who did the stabbing should be treated in the immediate aftermath.

At best you could assume that it means the 78 year old only used as much force as was necessary to prevent the risk to himself and did not use unnecessary force since if he had the stabbed man is likely to have died at scene.

To be honest I'm not sure what the fuss is about. What else could/should the police have done?
 
where did your post say anything about a screwdrive, or reasonable force or threat? It didn't. It is not out of context at all. It is very much in context with what you wrote.

You're just being obtuse for the sake of it. You very well know the context in which my post was made, don't try and pretend otherwise. Every other poster has grasped the concept.
 
Not really related to the break in, but did you know Trespassing isn't a criminal offence? It's a civil matter.

If somebody opens your (unlocked) door and enters your house, it's not something the police can do much about if they don't steal anything or harm anyone. And though you are allowed to use "reasonable force" to remove them, homeowners have a duty of care to ensure they don't come to any harm!

It's only when the break in that it becomes an actual crime.
 
A bit early and details are sparse but taking it as reported now, there was a home invasion, attempted robbery, threatened with and actually injured before killing the chap in a scuffle... I would say good on to the old gentleman and the scrote deserves to be dead today.

Let's see how it pans out though.

Very much this! Law needs to change, if you break into someones house ANY force is necessary
 
A stabbing in which a man died. The when and where doesn't matter if the person died as a direct result of injuries sustained when he was stabbed and as such has no baring on how the person who did the stabbing should be treated in the immediate aftermath.

eh? Again, you were talking about him being arrested because someone died:

A man died in his house, apparently as a result of his actions, I'm not surprised the police arrested him.

it doesn't appear to have happened that way.. it seems (at least according to earlier reports of him being arrested for GBH) he was arrested and then the person died... i.e. the fact the person died isn't the initial reason for his arrest, the stabbing is... it is a straightforward point, I don't know why it has taken several posts for you to still not get it.

What else could/should the police have done?

(again, as a disclaimer, this is on the assumption that the person acted reasonably)

In terms of what else could they have done - perhaps not drag a nearly 80 year old man off in the early hours of the morning to lock him in a cell and/or question him after he's just had his life threatened in his own home, scuffled with a burglar etc.. a rather traumatic event.

AFAIK they can question someone under caution without arresting them.

So, if there is something else that has yet to be reported, as a reason for his immediate arrest then that is one thing, but otherwise (if it is as some posters have mentioned earlier, just procedure, just doing their job etc..etc.. ) then it does seem like a rather ****ty way to treat a victim of a crime.
 
and what you said has what to do with any off what was said before?
clue it isnt. re-read what he said and what it would open up. not once did he say anything like reasonable force. Just a blanket right to kill any intruder.
lol, the angrier you get the more unintelligible your posts are.
 
some more details here:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/04/suspected-burglar-dies-tussle-pensioner-78/
One suspect, armed with a screwdriver, forced the home-owner into his kitchen when he discovered them, while his accomplice went upstairs.

Detectives believe a struggle ensued between "one of the males and the home-owner" and the 38-year-old intruder was stabbed in the upper body.

He was later found collapsed in nearby Further Green Road by paramedics from London Ambulance Service, who took him to a central London hospital where he died at 3.37am. Police were unable to confirm whether the suspect had been stabbed with the screwdriver.

In a statement Scotland Yard said: “At 00:45hrs on Wednesday, 4 April, police were called by a home owner to reports of a burglary in progress at an address in South Park Crescent, Hither Green SE6, and a man injured.

“The 78-year-old resident found two males inside the address. A struggle ensued between one of the males and the home owner. The man, aged 37, sustained a stab wound to the upper body.”


The home owner suffered bruising to his arms and his injuries are not life threatening.

Police arrested him on suspicion of grievous bodily harm before then arresting him on suspicion of murder.

He was taken to a south London police station where he remains at this time.
 
lol, the angrier you get the more unintelligible your posts are.
That's funny seeing as theres zero anger.

Read what he wrote, again there's no reasonable forces nothing about screwdrivers nothing. Just a legal right to kill intruders regardless of anything else. So my post is very much on point. If he wants to clarify and water it down, then you essentially end up with what we have now.
 
eh? Again, you were talking about him being arrested because someone died:



it doesn't appear to have happened that way.. it seems (at least according to earlier reports of him being arrested for GBH) he was arrested and then the person died... i.e. the fact the person died isn't the initial reason for his arrest, the stabbing is... it is a straightforward point, I don't know why it has taken several posts for you to still not get it.



(again, as a disclaimer, this is on the assumption that the person acted reasonably)

In terms of what else could they have done - perhaps not drag a nearly 80 year old man off in the early hours of the morning to lock him in a cell and/or question him after he's just had his life threatened in his own home, scuffled with a burglar etc.. a rather traumatic event.

AFAIK they can question someone under caution without arresting them.

So, if there is something else that has yet to be reported, as a reason for his immediate arrest then that is one thing, but otherwise (if it is as some posters have mentioned earlier, just procedure, just doing their job etc..etc.. ) then it does seem like a rather ****ty way to treat a victim of a crime.

I don't see what relevance the fact the guy didn't die immediately has on the way the police dealt with it. He was ultimately arrested because his actions lead to the death of someone else despite the original arrest for GBH. The 2 aren't unconnected.

The only way to determine, asyour disclaimer requires, if the 78 year old acted reasonably is to investigate. Arresting the suspect of a potential crime does several important things. It prevents the suspect from tampering with the scene and or witnesses while the police investigate, it prevents the suspect from disappearing, it ensures the suspect is made fully aware of their rights and it allows the police to question them more formally. It seems to me that following proceedure is not an unreasonable thing to do given that a man was grievously injured and subsequently died of the injuries sustained. Id hope the police have treated the elderly man with compassion and care, he is, after all also the victim of crime and likely to be shaken butthey c
 
I'd assume that they'd have to ascertain whether the intent was to kill or injure. Whilst the old gentleman should be perfectly entitled to defend himself, I'm not sure how I feel about people "deserving" to die for breaking and entering.

Not deserving as such but do you care? I care more about the slug I accidently stood on this morning.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom