What would a third world war really look like?

I recently watched a documentary about Hiroshima and was shocked by horrific devestation shown.

It's off topic , but I think it's disgusting those bombs were dropped on essentially women, children and the elderly by the USA.
arguably not far off what the British did to Dresden etc. as Angilion said
 
Last edited:
The western population aren't interested in a war they are to fat and lazy. Look at what happened when KFC ran out chicken. Imagine what the scenes would be like if they cut the internet off, around 25% this forum alone wouldn't know how to function. God forbid a neighbour's parcel was delivered or they found some out of date food.

Carnage
 
I recently watched a documentary about Hiroshima and was shocked by horrific devestation shown.

It's off topic , but I think it's disgusting those bombs were dropped on essentially women, children and the elderly by the USA.

Quite a lot of historians claimed Japan was trying to surrender too. Kind of makes you wonder if it was done out of pure hatred.

Lots of innocent dead women and children is what a third world war would look like.

Another person who thinks all men are guilty. Couldn't possibly be any dead innocent men too.
 
I recently watched a documentary about Hiroshima and was shocked by horrific devestation shown.

It's off topic , but I think it's disgusting those bombs were dropped on essentially women, children and the elderly by the USA.

Quite a lot of historians claimed Japan was trying to surrender too. Kind of makes you wonder if it was done out of pure hatred.

Lots of innocent dead women and children is what a third world war would look like.

Is not far off from the British bombardment of Dresden with incendiary bombs. In just a few hours, around 40,000 civilians were blown up or incinerated.
Dresden was a university city far away from any military target or any significance. Let alone in February 1945 where Germany was almost gone.
And because it was that soft target, that even the Germans didn't believed someone could attack a military free area the devastation was complete and the bombardment went unopposed.

Even Churchill himself later wrote that "the destruction of Dresden remains a serious query against the conduct of Allied bombing".

And from a Telegraph article back in 2015 at the 70th anniversary of the attack
Victor Gregg, a British para captured at Arnhem, was a prisoner of war in Dresden that night who was ordered to help with the clear up. In a 2014 BBC interview he recalled the hunt for survivors after the apocalyptic firestorm. In one incident, it took his team seven hours to get into a 1,000-person air-raid shelter in the Altstadt. Once inside, they found no survivors or corpses: just a green-brown liquid with bones sticking out of it. The cowering people had all melted. In areas further from the town centre there were legions of adults shrivelled to three feet in length. Children under the age of three had simply been vaporised.

dresden_3191294c.jpg



As for Nukes. EACH Trident missile has enough warheads to completely devastate 6 major European cities at the size of Berlin and Frankfurt.
While the nuclear arsenal of US and Russia alone is enough to destroy completely the planet numerous times, making it a lifeless rock in space.

And that because some hot headed morons, want to create a oil & gas pipeline through Syria, to stop Russia supplying Europe with them.
 
Last edited:
Germany was in a total war economy, if you weren't in a uniform carrying a gun then you were supporting the war effort in your work. This unfortunately makes civilians a legitimate target as they are essentially military industrial workers.

@Panos I think Dresden was very bad, but in context 40,000 died in the London Blitz as well, yet your focus seems to be solely on what bad the Allies did
 
Last edited:
I remember Threads. Bizarrely and rather specifically, the melting milk bottle and a woman wetting herself while looking at a mushroom cloud! Will stay with me forever! There was also an old film called Day After Tomorrow (something like that) which was more about survivors in the US. Both frightening. To be honest, I can't decide which is the lesser evil, nuclear war or conventional with all the misery which goes with it (conscription, POWs.. general devastation) as opposed to being reduced to ash in seconds (bar the unfortunate few).

What a glum thread for a late Monday evening.
i actually watched Threads last week....wish I had'nt now tbh
 
Even their kids?

I mean it's unfortunately collateral damage, we suffered the same, it's not as if we had options in terms of smart weapons. We could've not bombed Germany and potentially lost more of our soldiers and civilians because the Germans had more equipment available?
 
Even their kids?

Reminds me of a conversation with an old boy once - in the closing days of the war the men they encountered largely had seen too much of war and ready to give up but the kids (who had been mobilised) would often still try to fight them even when captured - he remarked that mercifully several times they came on groups of them at barricades sleeping from exhaustion so they could disarm and capture them without a real fight.

EDIT: Think there is a movie that covers it as well - kids as young as 10-11 were issued with anti-tank weapons and sent out against approaching allied forces, etc. total war is hell.
 
Last edited:
@Panos I think Dresden was very bad, but in context 40,000 died in the London Blitz as well, yet your focus seems to be solely on what bad the Allies did

Dresden is arguably the better example when comparing the devastation suffered in a single raid. 40,000 died in the Blitz over the course of 8 months or so; in Dresden, a similar number were killed in a matter of hours.

The Blitz was of course devastating, but Panos was looking for a comparison to the effects of a single atomic weapon; Dresden, as a series of raids which effectively levelled the city over a short time period, is therefore the better example. That doesn't imply he's unfairly focusing on Allied transgressions, nor excusing what the Germans did to London, Coventry, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom