speed limits on motorways are from mentally impaired for mentally impaired people
OP filed under stupid
Back button
speed limits on motorways are from mentally impaired for mentally impaired people
According to the OP, the story is that because he believes Muslims get away with everything no other laws must be obeyed by white people.
Where can one acquire such a device?
OP filed under stupid
Back button
I know where you can acquire at least one. Might have some slight water damage though.
The courts do not tend to look too fondly on those found to be perverting the course of justice.
The guy acted like he was entitled to ignore the rules everyone else has to follow and his contempt for those rules, then tried to hide the evidence of that. Seems he got exactly what he deserves in my opinion.
I would guess that the attempt to dispose of the evidence was most of the problem.
I just laughed out loud whilst reading this on the toilet. I'm now known as the chortling ****ter in the office.
Are your khazi walls made of paper or do you chortle really loud? Do you guys have set times where you go to the loo together? Were there many people on the khazi too? Man you shroud your stories in mystery![]()
Whilst it’s clearly a ridiculous sentence, anybody with a brain knows that if you disrespect the police / authorities but aren’t from a “troubled background”, have a clearly identifiable car registered to you, a fixed address, etc etc, they’re going to throw the book at you as all you’ve done is make everything incredibly easy for them.
It’s far easier for them to solve crimes like this than waste time trying to trace some chav on a dodgy estate who’s crashed a 20 year old stolen Fiesta and run off, or the guy who nicked your sat nav last week. I guess you can’t really blame them for going after easy targets, it does make their crime stats look better after all.
Yeah, they're too busy going after all the old guys in Range Rovers with jammers who lie about having one, where the vehicle is and who then try to destroy evidence. Definitely.
You do understand the difference between the police and the courts, surely?
Do correct me if I’m wrong, but as far as I’m aware, the police provide evidence to the court, who then decide to prosecute based on such evidence.
Surely a man who was stupid enough to drive a car registered to him and make rude gestures at a police vehicle he knew was recording him is far easier to trace than someone in an unregistered vehicle with no fixed address?
I think you might have jumped to conclusions when reading my post - I wasn’t even criticising the police....
It read like you were sarcastically suggesting the police will go for easy targets and ignore anything requiring some work, apologies if that isn't the case.