Toronto Van Incident: 10 dead 16 injured

So whats reasoning behind this, because last i checked Canada is a very weird dichotomy of ultra-conservative economic policy and some ultra-stupid social policies flying about, with a moron Prime Minister to boot. (man i thought Harper was awful, but Trudeau is a right waste of breath)
 
Last edited:
the reasoning seems to be it is some 4chan/reddit freak:

"All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!"

I guess up in Canada a van is easier to make use of for this sort of thing than an "assault rifle"/AR15
 
I mean generally vehicles are far superior in their ability to kill lots of people compared to a gun, sure you can still ruin it by crashing into a hard object, but generally... it's a lot easier to achieve with little skill involved.

It's also infinitely scarier to boot, having to be wary of vehicles of which you see hundreds if not thousands every day, vs a potentially concealed explosive/weapon.
 
Was it an incel then or religious/political narrative?

Involuntary Celibate (or celibacy, depending on context). Basically a whiny man-baby who has a big boo-hoo that girls mysteriously don't want to sleep with him. Big crossover with the kind of people who bleat about 'SJWs', MRAs, and 'red pillers'.
 
Apparently today is Armenian Genocide Remembrance Day, and the building he hit people outside of has Arabic writing on it. Maybe attempting to target Muslims, or could just be a coincidence.
 
Involuntary Celibate (or celibacy, depending on context). Basically a whiny man-baby who has a big boo-hoo that girls mysteriously don't want to sleep with him. Big crossover with the kind of people who bleat about 'SJWs', MRAs, and 'red pillers'.

So, we could have a sexually frustrated anti-SJW, who although possibly good with computers was a social failure? Now, where would they hang out?
 
So, we could have a sexually frustrated anti-SJW, who although possibly good with computers was a social failure? Now, where would they hang out?

Indeed, are we sure he wasn't a member here?

I can imagine the sort of posts he wrote included the words **** (what chickens do), feminazi etc.
 
Last edited:
Involuntary Celibate (or celibacy, depending on context). Basically a whiny man-baby who has a big boo-hoo that girls mysteriously don't want to sleep with him. Big crossover with the kind of people who bleat about 'SJWs', MRAs, and 'red pillers'.

I said a while back that these internet echo chambers for socially retarded man-babies are a breeding ground for mass killers.

You wait until Trump gets kicked out....only a matter of time before the first mass killing gets live streamed to /r/The_Donald.
 
I said a while back that these internet echo chambers for socially retarded man-babies are a breeding ground for mass killers.

You wait until Trump gets kicked out....only a matter of time before the first mass killing gets live streamed to /r/The_Donald.

Interesting to compare and contrast your abusive denigration of a certain group who don't have a central text or ideology that openly and explicitly endorses violence against others. To another group that absolutely do have a central text, a supposedly perfect and unalterable text, that explicitly not just condones but instructs adherents to commit violence against others.

The more we marginalise and demonise Muslims in general the easier it becomes for the bad eggs to be radicalised (not helped by generally crappy economic conditions here).

I am sure you will cease to marginlise people who may have sympathy for at least some of Trumps campaign points and who have endured 'crappy economic conditions' to avoid radicalising the 'bad eggs'?

/sarcasm

In truth people like this guy in the van and a lot of jihadis have a lot in common.

Mass murderers are often social misfits who latch onto something which they use as inspiration and/or justification for their actions.

The difference is numbers (a lot more mass murderers cite religious texts then obscure Internet sub forums in their pre or post murder diatribes) and of course the presence of supposedly perfect, divine texts in one case and a load of often rather random **** posts on the other.

Still I guess you are only following the typical contemporary Germanic path of self delusion and destruction (which is far from a unique phenomenon limited to Germany) where you still have draconian punishments for people who hold silly, risible views openly about the countries facistic past but yet promote the mass importation of adherents of another ideology with some rather similiar totalitarian views and then suggest that its bad to challenge some of the more extreme views and practices in case it upsets them and they (prematurely) turn homicidal.
 
While the 99% of people on 4chan are edge-lord trolls who are trying to be funny, there seems to be some taking all the nonsense in and actually acting on it. I think we are probably going to see a rise of these sort of marginalised people goaded into doing something by people on the internet.

I do find it quite funny the usual 'blame the left' suspects in this thread. Just waiting for someone to post cultural marxism.
 
The difference is numbers (a lot more mass murderers cite religious texts then obscure Internet sub forums in their pre or post murder diatribes) and of course the presence of supposedly perfect, divine texts in one case and a load of often rather random **** posts on the other.


The facts are clear that religion itself is not the main cause of terrorism:
https://angrymeditations.wordpress....yths-is-islam-the-biggest-cause-of-terrorism/

White supremacist re responsible for early as many incidents as Islamic Extremists in the US. By far the biggest offenders are of political, separatists causes. The Eco-warriors frequently to blame.
 
Back
Top Bottom