• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Will HBM be an actual benefit on a consumer GPU anytime soon?

I have a Fury-X and game at 3440 x 1440 and personally haven't noticed any issue with vram capacity, the card runs out of grunt before 4GB is a problem, atleast in the games I play. Whether that's down to driver witch craft or an inherent advantage of HBM i'm not sure or maybe the games I play just don't need more than 4GB(?)


In some modern games the FuryX has dropped in performance a long way behind the 980ti when at release there was only a small difference.
for example mass Effect:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mass-...55712/Specials/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-1223325/
980ti is 46% faster.
 
In some modern games the FuryX has dropped in performance a long way behind the 980ti when at release there was only a small difference.
for example mass Effect:

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Mass-...55712/Specials/Mass-Effect-Andromeda-1223325/
980ti is 46% faster.

I had a 980Ti before the Fury-X, infact the same factory overclocked one they used in that article you linked to. I don't actually see a problem with vRAM in that title, especially considering cards with the same or less vRAM seem to be performing as you would expect.
https://kotaku.com/mass-effect-andromeda-pc-benchmarked-on-24-different-v-1793435595
Here's another article which shows the two abit closer, and as you can see, even at 1440p a 3GB 1060 is doing just fine.
 
Back
Top Bottom