Hillsborough inquest verdict.

Status
Not open for further replies.
But let's face it the myths that are.mentiobed in this done correlate to the reality and are either inconsistent or incoherent.

For example the myth about ticketless fans - no one said that none of the fans had tickets but that some did not and that the some who did not were looking for any way to force their way in. This was accepted as true by the judge.

He accepted there were "small groups without tickets" looking to "exploit any chance of getting into the ground"

The fans weren't all drunk.. well it diesnt take everyone to be drunk to cause a crush.

The Taylor Report, while accepting there was a "drunken minority" of fans

Even a minority pushing alongside those without tickets looking to exploit the situation can cause a huge problem when dispersed in a crowd.

I don't have time to go on but basically the inquest found that drunk and ticketless fans were present although in a minority.

It's like the aim of this was to give the majority who were blameless the ability to sleep with a clearer conscience. That's fine it also acknowledged what we know that drinker louts were present and may have made the situation.much worse.

We have first and second hand accounts how these minority of fans may also have been provocateurs in Hysel and as mentioned by secsygreyfox at other games too.

Did these fans exacerbate the situation? Would these tragedies have occurred had they not been present or acted in this way?

The report doesn't fully answer this.

The inquests acknowledged that some fans had no tickets and that a minority were drunk but concluded that despite this, the fans were not responsible for the events that afternoon. It was a crowd management issue.
 
The inquests acknowledged that some fans had no tickets and that a minority were drunk but concluded that despite this, the fans were not responsible for the events that afternoon. It was a crowd management issue.

Which politically was the required result.

But to assume that a load of ticketless, drunk fans with a track record of rushing/crushing/violence etc had no impact at all on the result is almost unbelievable.
 
With Liverpool fans? Hooliganism was wide spread throughout football in that era and Liverpool supporters were no worse or better than any other supporters. And why did it take you 2 decades to get it? The vast majority of evidence relating to the causes of the disaster were known in 1990? The only new evidence that came out recently was related to the cover up that followed and disproving the 3.15pm cut off time the coroner imposed which led to the original inquest verdict.

Of course it was rife but from the perspective of a Stoke fan, Liverpool & Leeds were the very worst, for Man Utd it was probably somebody else and so on.
It took me two decades because of my experience & prejudices which I did explain, I watched a very informative documentary (could be more than 2 years ago) and I was swayed.

Which politically was the required result.

But to assume that a load of ticketless, drunk fans with a track record of rushing/crushing/violence etc had no impact at all on the result is almost unbelievable.

There was one major contributing factor on that day and it wasn't the usual ticketless or drunken fans, it was the bloody metal fences that had been erected and no one taking any notice to open them when people were being crushed.
If those fences hadn't been there everybody would have ended up on the pitch.
 
Which politically was the required result.

But to assume that a load of ticketless, drunk fans with a track record of rushing/crushing/violence etc had no impact at all on the result is almost unbelievable.
Where has the load of ticketless fans come from? The Taylor report in 1990 rubbished this. What evidence do you have to support this nonsense argument?

There has never been any evidence to support the lies the police tried to push. They were rubbished in 1990 and again recently yet we still have people pushing them.
Of course it was rife but from the perspective of a Stoke fan, Liverpool & Leeds were the very worst, for Man Utd it was probably somebody else and so on.
It took me two decades because of my experience & prejudices which I did explain, I watched a very informative documentary (could be more than 2 years ago) and I was swayed.

Ok, I read your post as if you were talking about football fans in general. This is the first I've heard of any sort of Liverpool-Stoke issues too but anyway.
 
Ok, I read your post as if you were talking about football fans in general. This is the first I've heard of any sort of Liverpool-Stoke issues too but anyway.

Even now, it's well known that when we go on Potters holidays, Scousers come out in force to rob our houses (it may not actually happen but still a running joke).
When Liverpool were playing in the Champions League Cup there were many Facebook posts saying we were going back up to get our stuff back.
On Friday I was showing a colleague my £80 cycle lock and said "It needs 10 minutes with a plasma torch or a 3 year old Scouser with a pin" - it still runs deep for some of us :)
 
But that's what's weird, as i said before I've grown up in a generation of crowd management So not exoernces thid kind of thing, but when I'm queuing for something I dont touch the people in front of me , if somone behind me touches me I'll either turn around or stand there and make a gap.

I dont get this mentality of pushing against the person infront of you

This was 30 years ago though.. Go to Camden market on a sunny sunday and see if you nudge or get nudged.

Don't think of the crowd as queuing to buy a starbucks... There were hundreds of people funnelled into a tunnel. Like an hourglass.

Have you ever tried to get into a busy london tube station during rush hour...The one in Leicester sq is quite bad.

What normally happens during rush hour as soon as those doors open.

Everyone is going to try and get on at the same time...(like the dog with the big branch and the doorway)




What happens in this picture when the train starts to move or brake. People will push on each other

You can see how close the guy with the phone is to the person infront. If someone nudged that girl in the black chances are she would push the phone guy who in turn could push the blue t shirt guy etc etc

 
Excellent point, but such a view that the fans' behaviour was in any way, even in a minor way, a factor in the tragedy is heretical and will get short thrift these days.

Any hope of an impartial review of the tragedy has long gone, too much time has past and the 96 dead have now attained
the untouchable status of martyrs.

Indeed, which is why I said from the start that the government should just let the families of the victims of grenfell write the report for the enquiry. It will stop it dragging on any longer than needed with multiple enquiries being requested untill justice is perceived to have been done.
 
This was 30 years ago though.. Go to Camden market on a sunny sunday and see if you nudge or get nudged.

Don't think of the crowd as queuing to buy a starbucks... There were hundreds of people funnelled into a tunnel. Like an hourglass.

Have you ever tried to get into a busy london tube station during rush hour...The one in Leicester sq is quite bad.

What normally happens during rush hour as soon as those doors open.

Everyone is going to try and get on at the same time...(like the dog with the big branch and the doorway)




What happens in this picture when the train starts to move or brake. People will push on each other



Yes I have I've done all those things the th3 e was actually my point before I've seen them so busy people were up the stairs but no one was pushed off the platform which would take lots less force than crushing somone.

Your last point you say people push each other tryinf to force thier way on, isnt that then thier fault? Thier co cous choice to push somone to force them forward despite not knowing what's happening up front.

But that would mean the blame lies with the fans for pushing which the inquest says didn't happen.

The tube is funny though my friend won't stand anywhere but with thier back to the wall. Because theyr e gay and not from the UK, both things peoples have been pushed onto the tracks for
 
Even now, it's well known that when we go on Potters holidays, Scousers come out in force to rob our houses (it may not actually happen but still a running joke).
When Liverpool were playing in the Champions League Cup there were many Facebook posts saying we were going back up to get our stuff back.
On Friday I was showing a colleague my £80 cycle lock and said "It needs 10 minutes with a plasma torch or a 3 year old Scouser with a pin" - it still runs deep for some of us :)

Thats the same form all over though. We have the same jokes about Scousers and I live 10 miles form an L postcode.
 
Indeed, which is why I said from the start that the government should just let the families of the victims of grenfell write the report for the enquiry. It will stop it dragging on any longer than needed with multiple enquiries being requested untill justice is perceived to have been done.


The grenfell thing is redicoulous now. They are still putting people up in hotels at more than 1k a week when they didn't even live there.

There's 1 student who lives 4 miles away and was just visiting he's now living in a council paid for hotel after they refused to pay his rent in his shared flat so he said he couldn't go home because he was paranoid about the people he shares woth causing a fire (4 stahotel though is fine it seems)

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.da...enfell-survivors-DIDNT-live-tower-hotels.html

‘I didn’t live there but I’m affected like everybody else,’ he said. ‘I went to the council support centre and told them how I am affected and asked whether they could pay the rent or get me a room. I said I needed urgent help. I need to be in a safe environment. They wouldn’t listen to anything because I came from a different borough. They kept pushing me away.’


The council has offered him permanent accommodation in a studio apartment, but the offer has not been accepted and he is holding out for a one-bedroom flat.

He said: ‘I don’t like being in the hotel. I need to be rehoused in a one-bedroom flat. The hotel is unsuitable.’
 
Yes I have I've done all those things the th3 e was actually my point before I've seen them so busy people were up the stairs but no one was pushed off the platform which would take lots less force than crushing somone.

Your last point you say people push each other tryinf to force thier way on, isnt that then thier fault? Thier co cous choice to push somone to force them forward despite not knowing what's happening up front.

But that would mean the blame lies with the fans for pushing which the inquest says didn't happen

I know what your saying but its not the same....Imagine the platform is full, the stairs are full but the lobby has a few stragglers.. But the gates are locked (station closed) massive groups outside..100's more people. Then someone says I know lets open the gates and let all the people that are outside, inside

Also the platform analogy doesn't really work... Everyone knows if you push people on a platform someone is going on the tracks......You can see the tracks.... No-one in the tunnel could see people getting crushed
 
Thats the same form all over though. We have the same jokes about Scousers and I live 10 miles form an L postcode.

I expect that but if you live in Ipswich they probably say the same about people who live in Norwich and don't have Scouser jokes.
Anyway, the point is I had a season ticket from around 1968 and we always had a hooligan problem with Liverpool which led me to believe that Liverpool fans were to blame for Hillsborough BUT I DON'T NOW.
 
Where has the load of ticketless fans come from? The Taylor report in 1990 rubbished this. What evidence do you have to support this nonsense argument?

There has never been any evidence to support the lies the police tried to push. They were rubbished in 1990 and again recently yet we still have people pushing them.

It's from the judges report on the BBC. I quoted it in my post. The inquiry accepted that there was a drunken minority and also ticketless fans who were trying to use any chance to get in.
 
It's from the judges report on the BBC. I quoted it in my post. The inquiry accepted that there was a drunken minority and also ticketless fans who were trying to use any chance to get in.
The quote you posted was that there were a drunken minority of supporters at the match. So pretty much like every football match around the world? How have you gone from that to claiming there was loads of drunk, ticketless, violent fans? Where's the evidence of this?
 
The quote you posted was that there were a drunken minority of supporters at the match. So pretty much like every football match around the world? How have you gone from that to claiming there was loads of drunk, ticketless, violent fans? Where's the evidence of this?
H
I guess it depends how you define a load. But the best the judge could come up with was a minority I.e less than 50% but he stopped short of saying any or just individual's.

The truth is that this as you say was common before this game and more sickeningly after this game.
 
H
I guess it depends how you define a load. But the best the judge could come up with was a minority I.e less than 50% but he stopped short of saying any or just individual's.

The truth is that this as you say was common before this game and more sickeningly after this game.
More sickeningly? People have a drink at football games, then and now. Some could be classified as drunk. That doesn't mean they were ticketless and violent or were to blame in any way for the disaster as you've repeatedly claimed. Right from the Taylor report to the most recent inquests, there has never been any evidence to support the rubbish you've been posting in this thread. It was rubbish before the recent HIP report and inquest, it's sickening that you're spouting the same stuff after though.
 
I think more folk need to watch that documentary. None of the rank and file coppers who appear on the programme and were present on the day blame the fans at all.

They seem more annoyed at their superiors for altering their notes/statements, removing any criticism of Police procedure on the day. Quite telling, that.
 
More sickeningly? People have a drink at football games, then and now. Some could be classified as drunk. That doesn't mean they were ticketless and violent or were to blame in any way for the disaster as you've repeatedly claimed. Right from the Taylor report to the most recent inquests, there has never been any evidence to support the rubbish you've been posting in this thread. It was rubbish before the recent HIP report and inquest, it's sickening that you're spouting the same stuff after though.

You don't think its a fair to speculate that an element of drunkeness, violence or high spirits, led to the rush
through the narrow tunnel into the already full pens ?

If I was on a jury and such evidence was put forward I would have to consider that it was extremely relevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom