But let's face it the myths that are.mentiobed in this done correlate to the reality and are either inconsistent or incoherent.
For example the myth about ticketless fans - no one said that none of the fans had tickets but that some did not and that the some who did not were looking for any way to force their way in. This was accepted as true by the judge.
He accepted there were "small groups without tickets" looking to "exploit any chance of getting into the ground"
The fans weren't all drunk.. well it diesnt take everyone to be drunk to cause a crush.
The Taylor Report, while accepting there was a "drunken minority" of fans
Even a minority pushing alongside those without tickets looking to exploit the situation can cause a huge problem when dispersed in a crowd.
I don't have time to go on but basically the inquest found that drunk and ticketless fans were present although in a minority.
It's like the aim of this was to give the majority who were blameless the ability to sleep with a clearer conscience. That's fine it also acknowledged what we know that drinker louts were present and may have made the situation.much worse.
We have first and second hand accounts how these minority of fans may also have been provocateurs in Hysel and as mentioned by secsygreyfox at other games too.
Did these fans exacerbate the situation? Would these tragedies have occurred had they not been present or acted in this way?
The report doesn't fully answer this.
The inquests acknowledged that some fans had no tickets and that a minority were drunk but concluded that despite this, the fans were not responsible for the events that afternoon. It was a crowd management issue.


