• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

why is Cod:IW more demanding than GTA5?

Soldato
Joined
9 Jan 2016
Posts
3,727
Location
Derbyshire
would it be down to GTA5 being older and not just different game engines?

i purchased cod from cdkeys last night as it was 3.99, so price and the fact i want to make time to focus on video making for my youtube again amongst from just being one of those games for the collection and while i didnt have good expectations, the game runs at 8-14fps in campaign thats including playing around with the settings, it defaults the native 1440x900 of my screen, however for gta 5 at the chosen 1366x768 and graphic settings that put it over 600mb vram more than my card has that game runs smooth and fine at i think at like 30fps plus even playing online, lags online, but either way the game runs better on my system.
 
Probably because the game engine its using is a frankenstein's monster of tacked on and bolted on stuff. At its core its quake 3 but they've tacked and gaffer taped on enhancements over the years to try and keep it current so its probably very inefficient. It can use 10+ gigs of vram and still manage to look like a game from a decade ago. That franchise has raked in billions yet they still cling to an archaic engine that's well past its best, works i suppose as it still sells but you'd think by now after 16 years they would look into something new.
 
Probably because the game engine its using is a frankenstein's monster of tacked on and bolted on stuff. At its core its quake 3 but they've tacked and gaffer taped on enhancements over the years to try and keep it current so its probably very inefficient. It can use 10+ gigs of vram and still manage to look like a game from a decade ago. That franchise has raked in billions yet they still cling to an archaic engine that's well past its best, works i suppose as it still sells but you'd think by now after 16 years they would look into something new.

ha okay that seems a valid reason, mean i dont know which franchise has been round the longest, but i suppose it would make sense to try milk it to compete with console, i havent played a pc version of cod since MW2 lol.

making me wonder what mid-range gpu will improve it now lol.
 
Probably because the game engine its using is a frankenstein's monster of tacked on and bolted on stuff. At its core its quake 3 but they've tacked and gaffer taped on enhancements over the years to try and keep it current so its probably very inefficient. It can use 10+ gigs of vram and still manage to look like a game from a decade ago. That franchise has raked in billions yet they still cling to an archaic engine that's well past its best, works i suppose as it still sells but you'd think by now after 16 years they would look into something new.

Exactly this! Complete mess of a game, the game is also terrible so you got what you paid for :)
 
Exactly this! Complete mess of a game, the game is also terrible so you got what you paid for :)

ha i like IW, played hours of it when i used to have the xbox version, love the zombies, i skipped BO3 campaign as i wasnt a fan, IW actually had a good one which i actually completed lol(BO3 practically only cod ive not completed), so as the pc version has always been cheaper i was intrigued, while my computer cant play it currently i dont regret the purchase.
 
its fine now i got a new gpu ha, but for some reason my games are running on my vga screen which isnt my primary :rolleyes:.

anyways i was getting 8-14fps with the 710, with my 660 i am getting 34-60fps and like Doom, playing much smoother and this is with high settings, so im happy now lol, knew cod wouldnt be a waste.
 
Probably because the game engine its using is a frankenstein's monster of tacked on and bolted on stuff. At its core its quake 3 but they've tacked and gaffer taped on enhancements over the years to try and keep it current so its probably very inefficient. It can use 10+ gigs of vram and still manage to look like a game from a decade ago. That franchise has raked in billions yet they still cling to an archaic engine that's well past its best, works i suppose as it still sells but you'd think by now after 16 years they would look into something new.

WHAT? It still has elements of the Q3 engine? Crazy.
 
Back
Top Bottom