Georgia school to ask parents to paddle students as punishment

I don't recall ever receiving any wooden paddles to the bum when learning to drive though...
By then you should have been grown up enough to understand words and the threat of consequences.
That, or you just never paid your driving mistress the right kind of money!!

People have always complained about the younger generation not having any discipline or respect.
Oh, so that's alright then. We'll just ignore all the increases in violent crimes... or should we blame it on the few barbarians that are still spanking their naughty children?

Reality is that it isn't worse now than before and people don't need to be beaten to become respectable human beings.
Then why are far fewer people actually respectful, instead behaving like self-entitled asshats?

Likewise if you stole his toys he'd be upset.
Yes, but I'd have his toys and he can go **** himself, Daddy. That's life - There are the haves and the have nots. I have his toys, he has not a thing he can do about it. Bye now.....

That way you teach them why stealing is actually bad, if you steal and everyone steals, everyone is in a worse position.
So the way forward is to be the one who steals everything - OK then Daddy, I'm off to become a banker and put people out of their homes. Bye now....

All hitting does is introduce a risk vs rewards system
Yeah, so they'll grow up understanding the mechanics of Elite... Not a bad thing.

it teaches nothing about why stealing itself is bad.
It's not.
Getting caught might be, but stealing itself is not bad. It's merely taking the opportunities handed you by careless people, who clearly don't deserve to have nice things if they don't lock them up properly, you see Daddy... I'm off to nick some bloke's car. Bye now...

Also actually speaking to your kids and explaining things, it creates trust, hitting your kids over anything you don't like creates no trust, they won't listen to you when you do try to teach them.
You assume simply battering them to death over any infraction is all there is to it.

These two concepts are night and day, one results in a person who thinks stealing is fine and punching people is okay, but they fear the consequences, the other results in a decent human being who doesn't steal or punch people because they realise it's not okay to do those things.
People from both camps tend to commit crimes when they realise how unlikely it is that they will get actually get caught. Just look at how often people break road laws, for example. The internet is full of videos showing people breaking laws and getting away with it.
 
People from both camps tend to commit crimes when they realise how unlikely it is that they will get actually get caught. Just look at how often people break road laws, for example. The internet is full of videos showing people breaking laws and getting away with it.

Suggesting your previous example about driving lessons might not be all it's cracked up to be.
 
Suggesting your previous example about driving lessons might not be all it's cracked up to be.
Because they have since learned they can get away with it, because there's not enough Policing to enforce the law any more.
How many of those same people do you think would knowingly break the law right in front of a cop, when the certainty of punishment is massively increased?

They don't fear doing wrong, because it's wrong. They fear getting nicked - Even though it could be as little as 3 points and a £60 fine which mean nothing given how many people are already driving without a licence, insurance, tax and MoT anyway, they still fear the force that backs up the cop's authority.
 
Because they have since learned they can get away with it, because there's not enough Policing to enforce the law any more.
How many of those same people do you think would knowingly break the law right in front of a cop, when the certainty of punishment is massively increased?

They don't fear doing wrong, because it's wrong. They fear getting nicked - Even though it could be as little as 3 points and a £60 fine which mean nothing given how many people are already driving without a licence, insurance, tax and MoT anyway, they still fear the force that backs up the cop's authority.

If compassion will not instill the fear you say is required to teach lessons, and violence/fear will only provide adherence if constantly monitored then what's the point of either? To bring it back to the classroom, if corporal punishment and a lack of corporal punishment both provide equally crap results in practice, what reason is there to hit kids?

You seem confused in your reasoning somewhat. Earlier you implied that a rise in violent crime and the lack of respect is down to people not being smacked at school anymore, but in the quote above the issue with road crime is down to a lack of policing. Could it be that the rise in violent crime is also down to a lack of policing, and actually not some issue brought on by a lack of corporal punishment in schools?

I don't steal, and I don't speed. My reasons aren't to do with not wanting to get caught. I don't do either because of the impact I might have on other people. If you want to frame it in selfish terms my parents taught me compassion, and making other people feel crappy makes me feel bad, therefore I avoid making other people feel crappy when it can reasonably be avoided, self managing punishment if you like, no outside influence required.
 
Oh, so that's alright then. We'll just ignore all the increases in violent crimes... or should we blame it on the few barbarians that are still spanking their naughty children?

You could put that down to all sorts of things, why are you so sure it is due to a lack of corporal punishment? You have several generations of adults now that never faced the cane and the vast majority dont commit violent crimes. Can you go into detail about the trend in violent crime?

Was there an increase when corporal punishment was no longer used in schools?
 
Haha could you imagine this in this in the UK? There would be stories every week of a teacher being bludgeoned to death.

Seriously though; the land of the free? Yep, free to beat your children!
 
Wonder what will happen when that one kid shouts "Harder daddy! Harder!" after the first swipe?
It's America. Violence is fine but anything vaguely sexual... no... that's not right.

I still maintain that it's not a Christian country as they claim, but a puritan one.
 
To bring it back to the classroom, if corporal punishment and a lack of corporal punishment both provide equally crap results in practice, what reason is there to hit kids?
Pain and suffering is the most natural, and often most likely, consequence of doing something 'wrong' and the easiest way that humans and other creatures all learn not to do certain things. Certainly no child is going to sit still for a loving, caring, 45 minute lecture on the intricate complexities of interconnected human society and the potentially immense chain of events that mean their simple act of stealing could conceivably result in someone dying. That's something they pick up along the years as they grow up. Heck, even many adults would struggle to consider all that before they do something, but by that point a general level of respect and subconscious grasp of consequence has already been learned.

Basically, there has to be some bite to your bark, or you're just going to get get ignored and walked over by people who don't give a toss about your 'words' of discipline.

You seem confused in your reasoning somewhat. Earlier you implied that a rise in violent crime and the lack of respect is down to people not being smacked at school anymore, but in the quote above the issue with road crime is down to a lack of policing.
In both cases people lack consequences and/or fear of those consequences, to keep their actions in check. No confusion.

Could it be that the rise in violent crime is also down to a lack of policing, and actually not some issue brought on by a lack of corporal punishment in schools?
Also yes, but not wholly. Lack of respect leads to the crime becoming a viable consideration, because, like, who is really gonna care about it besides you? Lack of policing leads to the consideration becoming a viable action, because, like, who's gonna stop you?

I don't do either because of the impact I might have on other people. If you want to frame it in selfish terms my parents taught me compassion, and making other people feel crappy makes me feel bad, therefore I avoid making other people feel crappy when it can reasonably be avoided, self managing punishment if you like, no outside influence required.
See, I never needed to be taught any of that, and it's something I was never actually taught either. It's just something you figure out. If needs be, you can figure it out when someone does it to you, but it becomes pretty evident that making someone else feel bad hurts them just as much as it hurts you and life works better when you don't do that.

You could put that down to all sorts of things, why are you so sure it is due to a lack of corporal punishment?
Kids not learning respect from an early age.
We were never caned or anything either and as a result we behaved like absolute ***** to just about every teacher who didn't present some sort of threat. For only a few did we have lines that were never crossed. The one that everyone respected the most and never messed around was the one rumoured to have flung a chair at a pupil. But even then, we knew we were undisciplined and we knew there was no consequence to our behaviour... and by that age, we were generally too big to be spanked very easily.

You have several generations of adults now that never faced the cane and the vast majority dont commit violent crimes.
The majority didn't beforehand either, but we still have far less respect these days. Just a general trawl through GD threads is proof of that.

Can you go into detail about the trend in violent crime?
I can't be arsed to get into yet another Google-fest to try and scientifically substantiate a conversational opinion.
Feel free to go find loads of reports and university studies that may or may not suggest that crimes are at an all-time low, or whatever. I simply looked at a few Police and BBC reports, as anything further is too much like being at work but without getting paid for it.... unless you're willing to pay me for my time spent collecting data, cross-referencing and analysing it?

Was there an increase when corporal punishment was no longer used in schools?
A quick look suggests that experts from around the world are quite divided on the matter, especially in places like Germany and Scandinavia so often hailed as the bastions of No-Smacking policies... Some say one thing, citing a bunch of reports, statistics and studies, while the others challenge the data and point out that the first lot have drawn conclusions that are the exact opposite of what the data actually shows.
 
I wonder how many on the thread complaining against corporal punishment are on the other crime threads complaining about increasing crime and disorder?

I notice all these people against corporal punishment never suggest an alternative, or suggest one that doesn't work. There are more kids being expelled from schools these days because your detentions and time-outs aren't working.

The people who are suggesting no corperal punishment at all, not even as an option, are the ones putting forward an untested idea. A form of physical discipline as been around since humans were created, and in every animal species we see they will physically chastise their young for doing something wrong.

But no, for the human ego-maniacs out there, we're too good for how the rest of the animal world operates :rolleyes:
 
A form of physical discipline as been around since humans were created, and in every animal species we see they will physically chastise their young for doing something wrong.

Yes Yes... and it's been studied to death, it's been shown that it doesn't work which is why most of the civilised world doesn't do it anymore and bans it. :rolleyes:
 
Oh, so that's alright then. We'll just ignore all the increases in violent crimes... or should we blame it on the few barbarians that are still spanking their naughty children?


But thwyre less violent crime.

If anything we should be killing the older generation off as they were the violent ones and are advocating more violence against kids.
 
I'm on the fence with corporal punishment however I'd like to ask those who are against it:
Would you prefer the child is given detention?

The reason I ask is, for me, detention was a really bad thing to be given and I always chose to be hit instead.
In 5 years I had several detentions and I hated every second of them and wished they could have just hit me and it would be over in a couple of seconds.
I lived 7 miles from school and it was very hard to get home if I missed the school buses.
We also didn't have a phone so not getting home on time was also traumatic for my parents and they actually wrote a letter asking me to be hit instead of detention :)
 
I am old enough to remember kids being bent over the knee for 10 of the best with a slipper.
No permanent damage done to anyone and kids did behave more and you had the respect/fear for the staff.

Kids no days have zero respect.
 
How awkward would it be being the adult who has to spank some other parents kid with a paddle, I bet you'd get some right deviants trying to get a job there.
 
Yes Yes... and it's been studied to death, it's been shown that it doesn't work which is why most of the civilised world doesn't do it anymore and bans it. :rolleyes:
for every study wont there a be another study conducted by a different group to prove the opposite :confused:


'spare the rod, spoil the child'
 
Wonder what will happen when that one kid shouts "Harder daddy! Harder!" after the first swipe?
It's America. Violence is fine but anything vaguely sexual... no... that's not right.

I still maintain that it's not a Christian country as they claim, but a puritan one.


Haha just imagine the kid yelling that loud enough to be heard in the class rooms.

Principle would be shot by the end of the week
 
for every study wont there a be another study conducted by a different group to prove the opposite :confused:


'spare the rod, spoil the child'

No not really.

At least not when you only look at ones with sound methodology.

The usual "ah one study says this one says this" thing is usualy holding up say a proper peer reviewed peice that is widely supported against something like mmr causes autism disproved crap.

Or a 25 wuestion surgery given to 10 people
 
I am old enough to remember kids being bent over the knee for 10 of the best with a slipper.
No permanent damage done to anyone and kids did behave more and you had the respect/fear for the staff.

Kids no days have zero respect.


Well expect that That generation went on to commit far more crime than the zero respect generation.

I'd be very disturbed if a child respected somone for beating them..


My parents both had corporal punishment in school, including one weird sadist who just used to whack every kid every day on the hands with a fuller as they entered the class room.

They don't have much respect for that kind of person now...
 
How do people feel about PT punishment? Being made to run laps or do press ups or sit up or pull ups etc?
 
How do people feel about PT punishment? Being made to run laps or do press ups or sit up or pull ups etc?

That builds character, it's also good for fitness.

Kids these days don't have enough PT, saying that, back when I was in school, we didn't have enough, we had 2 hours per week, pathetic really.
 
Back
Top Bottom