Good question - lower mavity but also lower resistances.
mavity doesn't effect terminal velocity, just the acceleration up until terminal velocity.
Good question - lower mavity but also lower resistances.
mavity doesn't effect terminal velocity, just the acceleration up until terminal velocity.
What do you think provides that acceleration in most cases?
What do you think provides that acceleration in most cases? And in this case in particular where it is rolling down a slope?
assuming you're meaning 1° to the horizontal it'll be much slower than tv as the rolling friction will have a significant mechanical advantage over the horizontal component of mavity, as will the air friction as although it won't be falling down quickly it will be moving sideways quickly and air doesn't care which direction it's being pushed it'll push back.
ie instead of a=mg-Fd it'll be a=mg*sin(1°)-Fd-Fr
or in other words it's 0.017 times the force of mavity having to overcome both air resistance and rolling resistance versus the full force of mavity versus just air resistance.
Units error detected
Acceleration and terminal velocity are unrelated.
Incorrect. mavity is the means by which an object in freefall reaches any velocity. They are absolutely related.

)Time is an illusion.Just that space, and time, is twisted, perverted and sick!![]()
when boarding a plane why do we use the stairs when they have 2 elevators ? makes no senseA plane on a conveyor belt will land safely if it jumps just as the elevator crashes in to the ground.
Pointing out a unit error couldn't be any further from pedantry lol
Reminds me of the prototype Rover gas turbine car, the stall torque was around 3 times the running torque, so it didn't need a gearbox either.

I was too triggered by the error to finish reading your posti suppose by the standards of this thread you're right, but i still managed to get the point across didn't i?

I was too triggered by the error to finish reading your post![]()
I was Forced to stop readingIt was the mavity of the error then?
