Going, going... gone!

Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,162
I'm not really convinced but as far as pulling it off it wouldn't be that impossible - a heavy wooden frame like that gives all kinds of potential for hiding something away - with the mechanism behind some kind of flap that was connected to the mechanical part fairly easy to conceal it and easy enough to power a simple shredder from a battery and plenty of battery tech that can last for ages.

It would really need to be triggered by some kind of wireless signal though which might limit battery life a bit as it would need some kind of system to periodically wake up and poll for a trigger signal plus some low current for the timer, etc.

EDIT: Having looked at the video it is actually a custom job with some scalpel blades or something by the looks of it so even easier to power the feeding mechanism.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posts
4,387
Location
Baa
The genius is that it doesn't matter whether it's "real" or a set up stunt. The effect on those present is the same.

Banksy has turned destroying art in front of the art loving (or perhaps money loving) community into performance art.

I think it's brilliant.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,308
Location
Aberdeenshire
The actual mechanism presumably is just a pair of motor driven rollers to pull the painting through the razor blades hidden in the bottom.

I would hazard a guess that the person filming would have had the ability to even perhaps switch it on via discrete power button hidden in the frame somewhere, so it didn’t have to be on continuously.
 
Caporegime
Joined
24 Dec 2005
Posts
40,065
Location
Autonomy
The actual mechanism presumably is just a pair of motor driven rollers to pull the painting through the razor blades hidden in the bottom.

I would hazard a guess that the person filming would have had the ability to even perhaps switch it on via discrete power button hidden in the frame somewhere, so it didn’t have to be on continuously.

You sound like Jonathon Creek :D
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,162
I would hazard a guess that the person filming would have had the ability to even perhaps switch it on via discrete power button hidden in the frame somewhere, so it didn’t have to be on continuously.

Good possibility but the timing was rather precise and no one went that near it in the immediate moments before. It would make a much simpler implementation though.
 
Don
Joined
7 Aug 2003
Posts
44,308
Location
Aberdeenshire
Good possibility but the timing was rather precise and no one went that near it in the immediate moments before. It would make a much simpler implementation though.
Nah, before the auction they could easily have turned the trigger on/arm it, whilst having a “close” look at it, then once the auction actually finished used a phone or whatever remote trigger to actually start it up.

The only thing i’m interested to know is, who was the seller?
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,162
Nah, before the auction they could easily have turned the trigger on/arm it, whilst having a “close” look at it, then once the auction actually finished used a phone or whatever remote trigger to actually start it up.

Ah I see what you are saying.

The full mechanism seems quite elaborate and appears mains powered - unless they made it internally lit a bit tricky to get it plugged in if the auction place wasn't in on it and even then no guarantee the auction house would plug it in for the auction.

Xr648xO.png

Knowing Banksy it'll have been activated by the sound of the hammer going down.

Art.

That would be brilliant but far too easy to be falsely triggered without some kind of machine learning system processing the sound.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posts
4,387
Location
Baa
Ah I see what you are saying.

The full mechanism seems quite elaborate and appears mains powered - unless they made it internally lit a bit tricky to get it plugged in if the auction place wasn't in on it and even then no guarantee the auction house would plug it in for the auction.

Xr648xO.png

It didn't appear to be mains powered. Video footage shows no sign of external cables when it was removed and carried away.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,162
Video footage shows no sign of external cables when it was removed and carried away.

Yeah that is what I thought - but the construction appears to show some mains duty cabling, etc. maybe just used for charging though.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,162
There's all kinds of lithium cells that go into fire safety gear rated for years of standby.

Yeah even basic rechargeable 18650 batteries will hold their charge (or most of it) normally for years and years - never mind non-rechargeable stuff that usually has long shelf life.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
19 Nov 2009
Posts
4,387
Location
Baa
Yeah that is what I thought - but the construction appears to show some mains duty cabling, etc. maybe just used for charging though.

Very true.

For all we know, he's still fooling us: maybe the pics of the internals are a part of the act and nothing was actually shredded at all. Maybe the intact work just rolled up inside the frame as a pre-shredded copy emerged out of the bottom.

I wouldn't put it past him. :)

Edit: Sorry, I missed this:

That would be brilliant but far too easy to be falsely triggered without some kind of machine learning system processing the sound.

It would be possible if it was "armed" just before it went up. Very little chance of anything resembling a hammer sound triggering it during the auction.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom