67 is the retirement age for most people in the future.Just reading it, how has she still got a mortgage at 67? That seems like very poor planning, also if you want to downsize to a cheaper area and you only paid £500 odd grand, just drop the price to 900k and take whatevers offered.
Just reading it, how has she still got a mortgage at 67? That seems like very poor planning
What's the point of paying to get a valuation done, then?.
It is pretty accurate. in this case, a sale price for £100,000 less is just a deviation for 10%, not uncommon for a housing transaction.
Yep!No surprise the OP complaining about someone complaining over an over inflated price for a property
Still holding out for a Brexit crash so you can buy a property cheap.....
I can't be bothered to do the maths to work out the %age increase but I'd imagine it's completely indicative of the 'general housing market' actually. At least in the SE.Half of that increase has come about from the general area being tarted up from the dump it used to be, to subsequently attract higher-paying London commuters, though. Once they started moving in, the prices went right up.
Nothing (much) to do with the general housing market.
lol exactly.Mad, she complains its a ridiculously pricey area. Then reduce your price FFS, then it will be a not so pricey area.
Yep. Sounds like she's just been unlucky to be honest. If she'd have had zero interest, with no offers than she'd sooner have realised it's time to simply reduce the asking price.I think it's mental two people/couples who have that kind of money put offers in without realising stamp duty was a thing, unless they were just chancing it that she'd knock it off the sale.
So the point of this thread is to moan that someone feels entitled to sell their house at market value, my god what next people expected to pay the marked rrp on goods in shops.
It doesn't matter how much she paid for her house or when, what matters is the current market value of the property.