Is it right or even legal for a friend of mine to be singled out for a disciplinary when what they have been accused of has been common practice for the past thirteen years with the full acknowledgement of his management?
Another department has accused him of a breach of a policy and procedure document that was only written two years ago which does not take effectively in to consideration the practicalities of him doing his job.
He has been accused of leaving bag of coins in a room instead of the safe. The room has no access or windows except through a metal door that has two locks on it. Nobody who is unauthorised has access to this room and nobody is allowed to enter it unaccompanied. There is also CCTV.
The reason the money was not placed in the safe was because he was not given the chance to count it and there is a liklihood that if it was placed immediately in the safe, without checking there could be a mix up and he would be unable to account for any errors preventing them from occurring again. As previously stated, this has been the way they have done things for thirteen plus years.
There is a chance he could lose his job. The irony being that he is being accused of a breach when, with the full acknowledgement of his management, two levels above him, they don't even lock the safe until the evening due to it being on a timing system they think is too complicated for them to operate.
Another department has accused him of a breach of a policy and procedure document that was only written two years ago which does not take effectively in to consideration the practicalities of him doing his job.
He has been accused of leaving bag of coins in a room instead of the safe. The room has no access or windows except through a metal door that has two locks on it. Nobody who is unauthorised has access to this room and nobody is allowed to enter it unaccompanied. There is also CCTV.
The reason the money was not placed in the safe was because he was not given the chance to count it and there is a liklihood that if it was placed immediately in the safe, without checking there could be a mix up and he would be unable to account for any errors preventing them from occurring again. As previously stated, this has been the way they have done things for thirteen plus years.
There is a chance he could lose his job. The irony being that he is being accused of a breach when, with the full acknowledgement of his management, two levels above him, they don't even lock the safe until the evening due to it being on a timing system they think is too complicated for them to operate.