Nope.
Firstly, you said - "I would never use AF fans. They simply do not have a high enough pressure rating to overcome case grill and filter restrictions and flow needed air to components".
So by your own logic, SP fans would still lack sufficient CFM anyway, which simply is not true... in many cases, anyway.
Secondly...
Around the 2mm/H20 mark fans tend to average around 70CFM.
Down around 1.5mm they tend to be lower, but we do still see 70CFMs and even a few 90s. We also see some ridiculous values from some Quiet Edition fans around 1.2 with just 36CFM.
So yes, many SP fans do have comparatively low airflow, while fewer have quite a high value, and it was the latter I was advocating.
If ignoring what I actually said lets you think you're successfully arguing a different point altogether, then go ahead...
It seems you completely missed the bit where I explained exactly how many of them I had actually used...
It would likely cost me more in search time, price comparisons, waiting and in additional postage than I would feel like I'd saved, especially when nice quality versions of that stuff is already provided in the Noctua boxes.
Prices can change. Specs don't. Or would you suddenly start singing the praises of Noctua if they halved in price?
Most are quieter too, but you seem to prefer splitting pennies rather than even mentioning noise performance...
Noctua are one of those I like. Others mentioned above. I also have some GTs, but the jury is still out on those.
You need to read and understand what I post. My reply was to you saying " many SP fans start with a very low free airflow. Few have decent CFM."
That is false.
Most fans with good static pressure ratings have good airflow including their free airflow specification.
Aslo, and I'm guilty of doing it in this discussion, there really isn't any "static pressure fans" or "airflow fans" All fans have both airflow and static pressure. If you understand what creates airflow you know that it is pressure differential .. air moves from higher pressure area to lower pressure area creating airflow. Fans create a low pressure area on their intake side thereby drawing air to them and a high pressure area on the exhaust side where the air move away from fan into lower pressure area.
Also, you are confusing manufacturers' fan specifications and what the fans will actually do when we are using them. Specifications are almost always at maximum speed. Of companies have 2 fans of identical design but with one having a top speed of something like 1600rpm and the other having a top speed of something like 1000rpm. Both will perform the same at 1000rpm. NF-A14 series is a good example of this. Look at their airflow and static pressure ratings at all the different rpms and maybe you will see what I mean.
Actually, could you post some popular airflow and static pressure fan specs and links to same to back up you claims? Please do not post Corsair fans because they are notoriously mediocre or bad except for ML series.
For example here is PH-F140SP & PH-F140SP LED specs:
Speed = 1200 ± 250 rpm
Airflow = 82.1 CFM
Static pressure = 1.33mm H2O
And here is PH-F140XP
Speed = 1200 ± 250 rpm
Airflow = 85.19 CFM
Static pressure = 1.52mm H2O
And PH-F140HP
Speed = 1300 ± 250 rpm
Airflow = 88.6 CFM
Static pressure = 1.64mm H2O
And PH-F140MP & PH-F140HP_II
Speed = 1600 ± 250 rpm
Airflow = 68.1 CFM
Static pressure = 1.62mm H2O
Which of these is a 'low pressure fan' and which is 'airflow fan' ? This is Phantek's entire lineup of fans. To me all of the above have high enough pressure rating to do a decent job on almost all applications.
Noctua has some good fans, although most have peers that are better and lower priced.