titan X (pascal) vs 1080ti

[Mercutio]

Can anyone explain why a titan X at 1939mhz is handing my 1080ti (in the same rig)'s arse to it? The 1080ti hits around 2070mhz so it should easily "win" but pretty much anything I can throw at it is seeing the titan come out on top.
What gives? I thought the 1080ti was generally considered to be a whisker better?

 

[Finners]

At stock the 1080Ti is better. Max clocks they are the same or maybe a slight advantage to the titan just look at the timespy benchmark thread here and you see lower clocked TitanP trading blows with the 1080Ti.

When you say its beating your 1080Ti how much are we talking by?

 

[hyperseven]

Can anyone explain why a titan X at 1939mhz is handing my 1080ti (in the same rig)'s arse to it? The 1080ti hits around 2070mhz so it should easily "win" but pretty much anything I can throw at it is seeing the titan come out on top.
What gives? I thought the 1080ti was generally considered to be a whisker better?

How and what are you comparing the two cards?

 

[Mercutio]

I've not done a huge amount of additional fine tuning on the titan X (running the msi afterburner beta 10 auto OC "curve" setting), the 1080ti is my water cooled as per sig.
Tried a few benches but... firestrike for comparison.

https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/1...XQeKxNxiw96C803TvypZT4xvhAxn5K5S5juNJP-7go_8#

I know there's a decent chunk of difference on the physics score there... so... yeah, ok, that one example isn't the best but it seems to line up with stuff elsewhere too.
Just on the graphics scores, it's close or winning with a ~100mhz deficit.

Also (it's amazing how much validation one feels needs making when providing evidence ) that 1080ti clock wasn't 100% stable, pubg hated it. Much happier with the titan X.

If you look at CPU, the physics score is with lower CPU clock too.

I see enough issues there with driver versions/etc too. Take it as a general indication, not what I'm hanging my assumption on

it's just... odd. The titan X won't go much beyond that clock (1939 boost) without stability issues (will see, my waterblock is the titan X block so it might be on water soon). Most 1080ti's I've played with hit at least 2020mhz so I was expecting it to lose fairly badly.

 

[tamzzy]

doesn't the titan xp have 30 sm vs the 1080ti's 28 sm?
granted the xp is lower clocked compared to the 1080ti

 

[Mercutio]

doesn't the titan xp have 30 sm vs the 1080ti's 28 sm?
granted the xp is lower clocked compared to the 1080ti

it's more ROPs 96 vs 88, the titan Xp has the fully unlocked core, this is the Titan X (pascal). Clear as mud with the titan naming last gen

none of this is meant as a disguised brag either, I wasn't expecting the result at all though.

 

[tamzzy]

oh, you meant the 1st titan x pascal. lol. yeah. nvidia was being a bit of a **** with their naming scheme.

 

[Finners]

I've not done a huge amount of additional fine tuning on the titan X (running the msi afterburner beta 10 auto OC "curve" setting), the 1080ti is my water cooled as per sig.
Tried a few benches but... firestrike for comparison.

https://www.3dmark.com/compare/fs/1...XQeKxNxiw96C803TvypZT4xvhAxn5K5S5juNJP-7go_8#

I know there's a decent chunk of difference on the physics score there... so... yeah, ok, that one example isn't the best but it seems to line up with stuff elsewhere too.
Just on the graphics scores, it's close or winning with a ~100mhz deficit.

Also (it's amazing how much validation one feels needs making when providing evidence ) that 1080ti clock wasn't 100% stable, pubg hated it. Much happier with the titan X.

If you look at CPU, the physics score is with lower CPU clock too.

I see enough issues there with driver versions/etc too. Take it as a general indication, not what I'm hanging my assumption on

it's just... odd. The titan X won't go much beyond that clock (1939 boost) without stability issues (will see, my waterblock is the titan X block so it might be on water soon). Most 1080ti's I've played with hit at least 2020mhz so I was expecting it to lose fairly badly.

That's really is quite a bad example do you have anything else? All the GPU related benchmarks are within 1% of each other and given margin of error that's near as identical. 100Mhz deficit but thats's only 5% when you are up at those speeds and given the slight more ROPs that's why they come out the same.

 

[Mercutio]

That's really is quite a bad example do you have anything else? All the GPU related benchmarks are within 1% of each other and given margin of error that's near as identical. 100Mhz deficit but thats's only 5% when you are up at those speeds and given the slight more ROPs that's why they come out the same.

In work so it's the only example I had to hand.