Facebook to ban white nationalism and separatism

Facebook to ban white nationalism and separatism

Though what about the Israelis, since they are white also.
Aren't against the FB mantra the resent Israeli propagandist Facebook advertisements against Hamas in Gaza, using LGBT fake news? Isn't that preparation for the final solution of "white nationalism" against Palestinians in the biggest prison ever built on this planet?
 
Though what about the Israelis, since they are white also.
Aren't against the FB mantra the resent Israeli propagandist Facebook advertisements against Hamas in Gaza, using LGBT fake news? Isn't that preparation for the final solution of "white nationalism" against Palestinians in the biggest prison ever built on this planet?

They aren’t, they’re Jewish. Of which the zucc is a member.
 
In the wider picture this is facebook dipping its toe in to censorship (probably on the orders of government) to clamp down on certain views. Once this becomes acceptable then it'll move to bad other opinions too.

People keep falling for it everytime.
 
I enjoy this forum but threads like this make me question why I read it. White nationalism is disgusting. Just because other races can be racist as well does not make white nationalism any better nor does it make white nationalism a valid ideology.

I agree but I worry about what might be called these things in order to suppress them. I've been called a racist and a NAZI online. I'm not remotely either. For an alternate angle on this, look at how criticism of Israel has been enshrined in law as anti-semitism. And Israel actually is an apartheid state! Or how you get banned from Twitter for saying that there are only two sexes. Would we equally see bans on people supporting Catalonian independence or Irish independence or Ukranian or Crimea groups? What about kurds who want their own nation? The list of debate that becomes bannable goes on. And the especially insidious thing about banning speech is that once it is banned, the only person who can know if it was truly what it's accused of being, is the person who censored it. There's the theoretical question of whether or not speech should be censored, and there's the practical question of whether or not those in control might misuse such power. History suggests they nearly always do.

And of course there's the question of Sunlight being the best disinfectant. Frankly, I would rather dialogue be public. I'm rather good at debating people and exposing flawed arguments. And there are few arguments more prone to being flawed than those based on "race".
 
They aren’t, they’re Jewish. Of which the zucc is a member.

Jewish people are, in the main, White. Ashkenazi jews are no more descended from some ancient Hebrew tribe than most other Western European peoples. In addition to regular interbreeding to the point of any meaningful difference long since eroded, there was a large wave of Jewish proselytisation around 9-11th Century, (iirc) where large numbers of non-hereditary Jews converted. You can Google up a tonne of Zionist sources who will try to come up with arguments that it isn't so or ramble about "Cohen genes", et al. But it isn't so. The large majority of Jewish people are White. Amusingly, I have been accused of being anti-semitic for saying Jewish people are not different to anyone else.

Zionism is a racial superiority movement, just like every other racial group has a supremacy movement. And it's just as bogus.
 
And yet fully supported by the most powerful establishments in the west, they may aswell be free to discriminate.

I don't understand what you're saying but you appear to be talking about a group of people as a political bloc and their privilege in relation to other groups of people defined as a political bloc. When then entire point of bringing down racism is to see people as individuals, not members of some monolithic race-defined super-group.
 
I don't understand what you're saying but you appear to be talking about a group of people as a political bloc and their privilege in relation to other groups of people defined as a political bloc. When then entire point of bringing down racism is to see people as individuals, not members of some monolithic race-defined super-group.

Can’t really do that when the likes of Trump, Blair, Cameron, Macron, Bush and their respective administrations all heavily pandered to Israeli Lobby to the point of insanity.

You can’t discuss race when any one group is off limits, it’s pointless. Which is where we can’t move forward until something seriously drastic happens to end these politically motivated connections. It’s thankfully begun to end for Riyadh if only trump would get out of the ******* way.

The last point was more political than race, but it can be conflated to Islam in a sense, the hypocritical position of US/UK foreign policy is boring.

Until such a time, fully expect a campaign to push white nationalism, because it suits the zionists and caliphate very well. As both seem to be free to do as they please without reproach as long as politically expedient of our leadership.
 
Last edited:
Though what about the Israelis, since they are white also.
Aren't against the FB mantra the resent Israeli propagandist Facebook advertisements against Hamas in Gaza, using LGBT fake news? Isn't that preparation for the final solution of "white nationalism" against Palestinians in the biggest prison ever built on this planet?

They only consider themselves white when they're spouting anti-white bull****.

"Hello fellow whites, we're the worst race ever!".
 
Last edited:
Can’t really do that when the likes of Trump, Blair, Cameron, Macron, Bush and their respective administrations all heavily pandered to Israeli Lobby to the point of insanity.

Israeli and Jewish are not synonyms as you well know. Which is my point. You want to rant about US support for the apartheid state of Israel, be my guest. But I'll maintain the distinction between Jewish and Zionist to my dying breath.

You can’t discuss race when any one group is off limits, it’s pointless. Which is where we can’t move forward until something seriously drastic happens to end these politically motivated connections. It’s thankfully begun to end for Riyadh if only trump would get out of the ******* way.

I could be wrong here, but I think we might actually agree on something.
 
They may not be synonymous, but politically in the highest echelons of power, there is no distinction.

I have to operate with that in mind.

No, you don't. Because you should not judge an entire group of people by a tiny faction of political elites. Nor are all Zionists jews. There are many non-Jewish Zionists in upper echelons of the US establishment.
 
I just have an instinctive opposition to bans of any form i think they are a lazy answer only good for the very short term it makes certain people feel good and never addresses the underlying problem. As much as i loathe white supremacists it is better to have them out in the open where they can be questioned rather then them retreat into a bubble filled only with their hate and bile and fellow knuckle draggers. It has become too easy to just ban something and it rarely solves anything the UK is a good example with it's firearms bans all that did was remove firearms from honest law abiding citizens and cover up police incompetence in the annual checks and now criminals have their own firearms factories. That said i don't think i have ever seen such poor quality elected representatives across the west and a bigger disconnect between the people and their representatives and things will only get worse until something drastic happens.
 
Sort of related to the topic - This guy sounds like a lovely chap

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-47693525

A man who plotted the murder of an MP will not face a retrial for membership of a banned neo-Nazi group.

Jack Renshaw, from Skelmersdale in Lancashire, bought a machete to kill Labour's Rosie Cooper and a police officer against whom he had a grudge.

The 23-year-old admitted preparing an act of terrorism but denied membership of National Action.

After a seven-week retrial, the Old Bailey jury said it was unable to reach a unanimous or majority verdict.

It can now be reported for the first time that Renshaw was last year convicted of grooming two adolescent boys online for sex.

During the first Old Bailey trial last year, he admitted a terrorist plot to murder Ms Cooper with a 19in (48cm) Gladius knife.

He also pleaded guilty to making a threat to kill detective Victoria Henderson, who was investigating him for sexual offences.

Renshaw's terrorist plot was foiled after a whistleblower - former National Action member Robbie Mullen - warned the anti-racism charity Hope not Hate, which then informed police.
 
Sort of related to the topic - This guy sounds like a lovely chap

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-47693525
Too right, more detail HERE. The racist neo-Nazi paedophile sounds quite charming.
He was born in Lancashire and became involved in politics in his teens - first with the English Defence League and then the British National Party (BNP), after meeting its then leader Nick Griffin at an event.
. . .
Renshaw, who was openly homophobic, was secretly a paedophile who had been grooming boys for sex.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom