I never said there are no false allegations I just think that, with cases such as Stuart Hall, the benefit is greater for justice overall and for the victims who felt unable to come forward before.
In regards to the context that you were unwilling again to refer to the whole sentence speaks volumes.
To the next part then there are plenty of allowances and special conditions placed depending on the nature of the victim and the crime committed - this is not an isolated case across the criminal justice system.
I never said you or anyone else wanted the anonymity removed I was just wondering how far you were willing to go with treating everyone the same.
Lastly, I never insinuated you were a rape apologist. I would say I suggested you had double standards and didn't understand the concept of equality. I suggested that you joined the debate (again) at that point to back up a position you agreed with by setting a standard on the discussion which you had not raised before and failed to live up to its standards since.
Frankly, if you get upset when someone accuses you of having a 'special interest' then you shouldn't come online. Everyone has special interests - for example Stockhausen will always raise the cause of the traditional left, Dolph will always champion the promotion of individual responsibility, Castiel will always enter any thread on the nature of religion, it would be fair to assume you are from the same cloth - having interests, I thought maybe this was one of those 'special interests' namely the shame and degradation of people who are false accused of instigating sex crimes. No more or no less - so leave the disgust out of it eh.
In regards to the context that you were unwilling again to refer to the whole sentence speaks volumes.
To the next part then there are plenty of allowances and special conditions placed depending on the nature of the victim and the crime committed - this is not an isolated case across the criminal justice system.
I never said you or anyone else wanted the anonymity removed I was just wondering how far you were willing to go with treating everyone the same.
Lastly, I never insinuated you were a rape apologist. I would say I suggested you had double standards and didn't understand the concept of equality. I suggested that you joined the debate (again) at that point to back up a position you agreed with by setting a standard on the discussion which you had not raised before and failed to live up to its standards since.
Frankly, if you get upset when someone accuses you of having a 'special interest' then you shouldn't come online. Everyone has special interests - for example Stockhausen will always raise the cause of the traditional left, Dolph will always champion the promotion of individual responsibility, Castiel will always enter any thread on the nature of religion, it would be fair to assume you are from the same cloth - having interests, I thought maybe this was one of those 'special interests' namely the shame and degradation of people who are false accused of instigating sex crimes. No more or no less - so leave the disgust out of it eh.
but it's not the length (around 7") it's the girth. I've measured it (c'mon who hasn't) and it's the same diameter as a can of Red Bull! :O
