George Soros funded voice actors.
Is violence against women now the new norm for the Tory party?
- Thread starter stockhausen
- Start date
- Status
George Soros funded voice actors.
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2006
- Posts
- 12,130
The Daily Mail huh?
"Rabid Remainers" huh?
"EU funding" huh?
Well who could possibly doubt the Daily Mail, they are as trustworthy as Bonker Boris
ps - look out for Sunday's Observer and the story about the far-right Trump fan Steve Bannon and Bonker (Nah, it wasn't me Guv, Honest, on my life!) Boris (LINK).
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 10,695
- Location
- Shropshire
Boris having allegedly had a heated argument with his current bit of fluff suggests he is not a "yes man", and given the negotiations he may embark upon very soon that's probably a very good thing 
The "yes men" I know are nearly always useless in any sort of high stakes deal making and come out as (nice guy) losers. So maybe he was just practising for his upcoming task 
The "yes men" I know are nearly always useless in any sort of high stakes deal making and come out as (nice guy) losers. So maybe he was just practising for his upcoming task 
It was proberly what the arguement was about.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 30,161
Genuine question
Do you think even 20 years ago the public would be happy to have someone who left his wife and kids for another woman as PM?
It doesn't personally bother me, though I don't have a lot of time for people who have multiple affairs, but it's interesting how views have changed over a short time.
Do you think even 20 years ago the public would be happy to have someone who left his wife and kids for another woman as PM?
It doesn't personally bother me, though I don't have a lot of time for people who have multiple affairs, but it's interesting how views have changed over a short time.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 28,767
- Location
- Auckland
Do these people (who don't exist) frequent your pub (which certainly doesn't exist) and make these comments (which have never happened) to you?Boris having allegedly had a heated argument with his current bit of fluff suggests he is not a "yes man", and given the negotiations he may embark upon very soon that's probably a very good thing
I know you're playing to type, and I respect that to a large degree, but you do have to apply some kind of standards between thinking and then following through.
Yup, he's totally committed to the public and the furthering of cohesive societal progression, but only if that society is an exclusive elite. Nothing to do with cronyism what so ever.But I'm sure that Bonker Boris will be totally loyal to the British public and will not sell us down the river
More or less, they reflect the changes in wider society.
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 10,695
- Location
- Shropshire
History is presumably not your strong point? There are umpteen British Prime Ministers of yore that had salacious private lives. I offer just one example for expediency, for more just Google "British Prime Ministers sexual scandal"
- David Lloyd George, Liberal, 1916 - 1922
- Lloyd George guided Britain to victory in World War One and presided over the legislation that gave women the vote in 1918, but he is remembered as much for his private life as his public achievements. Nicknamed the 'Welsh Wizard', he was also less kindly known as 'The Goat' - a reference to his countless affairs. (Scandalously, he lived with his mistress and illegitimate daughter in London while his wife and other children lived in Wales.) The first 'working class' prime minister, Lloyd George had risen to prominence by solving the shortage of munitions on the Western Front. It was his desire to get to grips with the requirements of 'total war' that led to his split with then Liberal Prime Minister HH Asquith. It also brought him closer to the Conservatives, with whom he formed a new coalition government when Asquith resigned. That coalition would disintegrate six years later in the midst of a scandal. Serious allegations were made that peerages had been sold for as much as £40,000. (One list even included John Drughorn, who had been convicted for trading with the enemy in 1915.) Lloyd George resigned in October 1922.
Boris having allegedly had a heated argument with his current bit of fluff suggests he is not a "yes man", and given the negotiations he may embark upon very soon that's probably a very good thing
Are you actually serious? You're equating someone apparently forcing himself upon his current partner* is a demonstration of his capability to the political tasks that he has ahead? Bizarrely, and perhaps ironically, his current partner being the person that is credited with making him socially (and electorally) acceptable once again.
*Boris Johnson has been sacked (twice) for being a proven liar. He's also had two failed marriages and fathered a child in a third relationship before this current one. Supporters of Johnson will doubtless evidence his good qualities but his track record so far doesn't seem to be consistent with what he will need to lead the country.
Boris having allegedly had a heated argument with his current bit of fluff suggests he is not a "yes man", and given the negotiations he may embark upon very soon that's probably a very good thing
In that case his girlfriend might be better suited to the role because it was she, by the sounds of it, who was telling him to foxtrot oscar from her flat.
No they don't. They reflect whoever is popular within a political party, as far from reflecting changes in society as it gets. Boris sure is a datum reflector of societies changes....not.
No they don't. They reflect whoever is popular within a political party, as far from reflecting changes in society as it gets. Boris sure is a datum reflector of societies changes....not.
The below was the specific question.
So let's look again at what you said (I'll ignore your childish emojis, they won't help you here).
Please share the popular political leaders and movements in the UK over the past few years that have led the way in turning multiple instances of infidelity and lying as being not only socially acceptable but advantageous.
Pmsl...what?
You said they reflect the changes in society,that they reflect that.
They don't.
Keep going with the attempts of belittlement, it stinks of hear me.
Nowt much more.
Have another read in the morning when you're sober. If you remember.
Haha.
Again...belittlement. You are consistent if not with substance.
Substance. Or attention to detail. You're lacking in both when it comes to addressing the question I asked. I'll paste it here again on the off chance you're not capable of scrolling up.
Please share the popular political leaders and movements in the UK over the past few years that have led the way in turning multiple instances of infidelity and lying as being not only socially acceptable but advantageous.
- Status