More poor looking Hollywood Remakes - "Charlie's Angels" and "Midway"

Soldato
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
8,217
Location
Stoke/Norfolk
So in yet more "Hollywood has run out of ideas" news we've got a rehash of both Charlie's Angels (70's female detective trio, re-done in 2000) and a WW2 classic from the 70's retelling yet again the most important naval battle in the pacific, Midway.



Charlie's Angels
- I really liked both the original and 90's redo of Charlie's Angels, with both having a trio of strong women who didn't see femininity as a weakness and used it as a strength to beat (mainly male) criminals yet the trailer for the new remake just looks so bad, with 2 androgynous actors, a gender swapped Bosley, "woke" lines right at the start etc clearly making me not the target audience the film is going for, which I'm guessing would be 17-21yo women in "humanities" colleges, which I'm really OK with but it'll be a shame when it crashes and burns.

Midway
- I liked the 70's film but you could see the lack of SFX/Action budget hurt it a lot with it having to re-use so much "ToraToraTora" footage amongst other films like "the Battle of Britain" too (the budget went on the all-star cast instead) so I was hoping this new CGI version would at least look the part as the fairly small "A-List" cast means the wage bill should be quite small. However it looks awful, almost video game cut-scene bad in places so I think this'll be another crash and burn which, as a WW2 naval film buff, is a huge shame to me.
 
Last edited:
Another remake of a remake.....great! :rolleyes:

So Elizabeth Banks is Bosley (that's John Bosley! :D) - I'm genuinely surprised that they haven't made one or more of the Angels male!
 
Eh... let’s not pretend we’re all particularly attached to Charlie’s Angels! :p

Wow that first Cameron Diaz film is almost 20 years old (!!)
 
Hell, I remember watching the original series with Farrah Fawcett.

Anyway, in todays gender swap remake climate, shouldn't all the Angels be male....or at least Trans :p
 
Don't you mean LGBTQIA actor as an angel

:eek: HOW DARE YOU BE SO NON-INCLUSIVE!!!!!!! :mad:

It's LGBTIQCAPGNGFNBA which means Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex, Queer, Curious, Asexual, Pansexual, Gender-Non-Conforming, Gender-Fluid, Non-Binary, and Androgynous thank you veeeeery much :D

As much as I find the sarcasm funny, I struggle to empathise with people who scream for "inclusivity" yet seem determined to self-segregate themselves like this. As long as it's legal I don't care what/who you do and I don't want to know thanks.
 
Midway honestly doesn't look too bad, but charlie's angels does. i think a lot of people like empowered/tough girlies but when it starts getting shoved down your throat every five minutes you start getting resentful of it. not only are the 3 leads female but just to make sure we get the point they gender swap an important male role too. i sincerely wish this well. hope it does as good as the ghostbusters remake.
 
It'll be interesting to see if the Charlie's Angels studio use the now tried and tested "sexist trolls" line when this flops as, with the 2000 film and it's sequel still proving that men indeed do like "Strong Female Leads" in the earlier versions, that particular excuse look unusable to me, unless they swap to "Russian Bots" again :D
 
Back
Top Bottom