The issue is the manufactures are aware of the inconvenience of driving a modern diesel, due to their complex system fitted to meet emissions targets. They won't even fit a light or allow a warning to easily identify when a regeneration is happening. F I'm their point of view, and I partially agree with them, any sign of warning would cause panic and people pesting the dealer for info, without checking the manual first.The wear&tear, as said, maybe a strong reason to avoid 30s journeys.
Castrol used to advertise 75% of engine wear during warm up, so - what does that translate into ?
if you have two cars both with 50k miles but one has 1/2 as many cold starts, that one will have 1/2 the wear (or so ?, anyone good at man maths);
so even if the emissions are in check, mpg might be going south and reliability, for the next (post pcp) owner;
(the diesels going to be taking longer to warm up too, so more wear, and the dpf has a limited number of life cycles)
seems a pity as a buyer you cannot demand to hook up on the OBD interface and get that data plus the number of regens.
Most of the people assume car as just a way to connect a to b, but their complexity makes that a dangerous assumption. And penny pinching most of the time will backfire. Clearly we can't have it all.
I love the 60mpg+ of a 2.0 diesel, but I'm aware of the inconveniences and possible costs in the long run. But someone doing, let's say 5k miles, mpg should be the last thing to worry about, as I don't believe that person will be driving a V8.
In the other hand, the popularity of SUVs, which are aerodynamically poor and heavy, are the perfect scenario for a diesel engine, where the mpg would be acceptable, but as most are just a replacement for a city car, the sensible option would be a good petrol engine, not the anemic small strained engines, but who's willing to see mid or low 20s mpg?
The idea of be able to check the DPF ia fantastic, but only for the actual owner or a potential buyer, never for the manufacturer or the seller.