Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 5,429
- Location
- Bristol
A family member has kindly agreed to gift the GF and I a 10% deposit for our first home up to a property value of £250k.
We've always done that dirty word (renting) for many years so house buying is new to us. Plus, although I have an excellent credit score, I do have a few credit cards being paid off on a 0% basis, and a bank loan which I'm 2 years away from paying off. The GF has a very good credit score, no credit cards and a bank loan which is 2.5 years away from being paid off. So, not seeing this gift on the horizon, I didn't think our borrowing power was very good at all.
We've got an appointment with an independent whole of market mortgage broker in a few days and in the meantime I've been running through a few online calculators (just based on input figures), reading first time buyer's guides and generally trying to educate myself on how it all works. The general impression I get is we won't be able to borrow enough to get the home we want.
Now, when I was downloading some bank statements from my high street bank website in preparation for our meeting I decided to apply for an agreement in principle which does a soft credit search for us both. Lo and behold I was offered the full amount we need in principle and about 6 different mortgages. I decided to up the amount to £280k (thus reducing the deposit to 8.9%) and was still offered agreement in principle but only a choice of 2 mortgages, with considerably higher repayments. In both cases I was given the option to apply online, being told if it's not suitable it's my own fault because I chose it myself.
So, while we're waiting for our meeting with the independent advisor, am I right in saying my bank (who I've been with for 18 years) are giving me a more accurate reflection of what we can borrow because they've credit checked us? Or are they just trying to lure us in with a great figure and then bring us down to earth with a bump?
TLDR: Bank offered the full amount we want as an agreement in principle but online calculators offer much less, who is most accurate?
We've always done that dirty word (renting) for many years so house buying is new to us. Plus, although I have an excellent credit score, I do have a few credit cards being paid off on a 0% basis, and a bank loan which I'm 2 years away from paying off. The GF has a very good credit score, no credit cards and a bank loan which is 2.5 years away from being paid off. So, not seeing this gift on the horizon, I didn't think our borrowing power was very good at all.
We've got an appointment with an independent whole of market mortgage broker in a few days and in the meantime I've been running through a few online calculators (just based on input figures), reading first time buyer's guides and generally trying to educate myself on how it all works. The general impression I get is we won't be able to borrow enough to get the home we want.
Now, when I was downloading some bank statements from my high street bank website in preparation for our meeting I decided to apply for an agreement in principle which does a soft credit search for us both. Lo and behold I was offered the full amount we need in principle and about 6 different mortgages. I decided to up the amount to £280k (thus reducing the deposit to 8.9%) and was still offered agreement in principle but only a choice of 2 mortgages, with considerably higher repayments. In both cases I was given the option to apply online, being told if it's not suitable it's my own fault because I chose it myself.
So, while we're waiting for our meeting with the independent advisor, am I right in saying my bank (who I've been with for 18 years) are giving me a more accurate reflection of what we can borrow because they've credit checked us? Or are they just trying to lure us in with a great figure and then bring us down to earth with a bump?
TLDR: Bank offered the full amount we want as an agreement in principle but online calculators offer much less, who is most accurate?