If you wasn't being ironic you might actually get it.
I'm not right wing, and I certainly not WOKE.
Donald Trump
- Thread starter wez130
- Start date
- Status
Imagine getting triggered (yeh I'm going to use this now seen as we are descending into playground stuff) by a fact checking website.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,181
- Location
- London, UK
"know the facts" and posts a Breitbart article. Yeah because that isn't a propaganda website that has no relationship with the truth
You then go on some total guesswork with zero evidence to back any of it up. For all we know Bolton or his agent were leaking his book all over town, in fact it I had to put money on it, thats exactly where I'd put it. I bet pre sales went through the roof.
ok, I'll play.. What news sites do you use?"know the facts" and posts a Breitbart article. Yeah because that isn't a propaganda website that has no relationship with the truth
Again, don't go after my points at all. No, straight to ridicule for the umpteenth time, do you not see it or what?
Why can't you pick out the information from some sites? You don't have to like them, for instance I've even been to CNN a few times, just get what information you want and ignore the rest..
If you think there are news sites out there with no bias then I have a shock for you. Every website is biased, for some it's obvious and others it's hidden.
If you say so, it was clear a while back. I've known about the Vindman brothers for ages, they are well known bad actors, put it that way, but also low hanging fruit - much better to come, hopefully.
proof, or source? nah - why bother..
You'ld lose, I bet it could be announced soon considering it's, Vindmans, happened.
I bet pre sales went through the roof.[/QUOTE]Did you buy it?
I knew about the Vindmans a long time ago, it wasn't hard to find if you look around - like most of the information I've seen. If you want to find things they are out there.
Because you pull it out your arse every time you get desperate.Imagine getting triggered by a fact checking website.
Don't question the article, or the truth of it, just criticise the source.
It looks like fact checking websites really give you the vapours darling.
If I could fan you, I would.
Seriously, no bullcrap. No where in the world is there a need for such a site. I, myself, can decide the voracity of a site - I don't need another site, that could have an agenda, to decide what I view.
I have nothing..
*fans vigorously*
You see you can post that long list of CT and claim its all true and we are just been mean on you but if you actually posted some evidence to back up your crazy ideas then perhaps you wouldn't feel like that you are being persecuted. Otherwise, you do come across as being mentally ill I am afraid.
I heard Barrack Obama and Melania Trump have a love child called Kenyaski and she is being held in Guantanamo Bay.
Not much is known, but more things are coming out about it every day. Check the biased fake news media in about 25 years to find out what really happened.
Not much is known, but more things are coming out about it every day. Check the biased fake news media in about 25 years to find out what really happened.
Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2007
- Posts
- 12,181
- Location
- London, UK
AP, The Hill, NYT, WP, The Times, The Atlantic, The New Yorker, WSJ, Reuters to name some.
CNN is nothing like Breitbart. They report facts but have a left leaning editorial and when they get it wrong they generally put their hands up and admit their mistake. Breitbart is a CT website that will happily report lies as facts. It has zero journalistic integrity.
Its not a case of bias. Yes they all tend to have a bias but sites like Breitbart will just print outright lies.
Oh you've known about the Vindman brothers have for ages have you
Tell us have you got someone on the inside? Your own source? Or have you been reading CT websites and Twitter accounts? You see if they were indeed leaking like you claim they would be breaking the law. They should use the whistleblower route, you know like the whistleblower used but then the GOP outed him. As they didn't the DOJ could indict them. Have they been indicted? No they haven't so I think its safe to say it probably wasn't them.I don't have a source which is why I made it clear it was my opinion. He had the most to gain from it, it got his book in the news cycle day after day. Occam and his razor again
We will wait and see won't we. My guess is that if they had anything on the Vindman Trump and his lapdog Barr would have had them arrested and taken from the WH in cuffs for maximum effect. Were they arrested? No they weren't.
No I didn't buy it and I won't be buying it. I have no interest in lining his pockets.
Amazing, you have the nerve to "educate" us by posting mediabiasfactcheck.com. Another left leaning "fact checker" that rates Snopes and Factcheck.org as unbiased, CNN and HuffPo rate as high on factual reporting, and assesses #WikiLeaks’s accuracy rating as “mixed” when it has never had to retract a single document.
Do you like that site because it confirms your biases?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
What is your alternative?
You missed the main part from your link about cnn.
"These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy"
Naughty boy
So why you and other trump supporters getting all moist about it??
Nothing will happen with the vote
#PelosiExonerated
This is the thing.
A religious person like you can't see the bigger picture of what is happening.
Your kind never will
You missed the main part from your link about cnn.
"These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy"
Naughty boy
Posted the same bits from each link.
If you want me to post that bit (ie the definition) for Breitbart, here you go:
QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.
The TDS is strong in this thread
Never mind the 2020 which is already a lock for Trump due to utterly pathetic candidates from the Democrats that fall over themselves like drunks to out-woke each other, the real derangement is coming when that blonde daughter of his is going to be the first female president. You know it's coming!
Never mind the 2020 which is already a lock for Trump due to utterly pathetic candidates from the Democrats that fall over themselves like drunks to out-woke each other, the real derangement is coming when that blonde daughter of his is going to be the first female president. You know it's coming!
- Status