• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards

I find it a bit tiresome that we get this for page after page on this thread. No nerve to touch though, I’ll happily go AMD if they’re out around the same time and have better performance.

To be expected as it's still all rumours, supposed leaks and random pics cropping up occasionally. It'll likely be this way til they're officially launched.
 
how is a graphics card good if it has poor price to performance?

they are like boilers...sit in a cupboard and produces frames as well as heat.

But they produce frames. That's why people buy them, and they're happy to pay more for that final 30% performance than they would for the first 30% performance.

Right now in consumer electronics, people have stopped caring about price to performance, and Nvidia (and almost everyone else) has been using it to their advantage. That's why flagship phones and laptops are now more expensive than they used to be. Simply because people pay for them.
 
Oh for sure you're right, But I'm changing my mind on this, i just don't think this is going to work anymore.

For the same reason Intel's similar marketing doesn't work anymore.



There is a new generation and AMD are targeting them quite successfully, AMD are becoming the cool brand..... they are about to go on a mindshare marketing campaign.

We make all the consoles, we make those cool new Laptop's that you young people are hot for right now, we make those cool Ryzen CPU's that all your favourite streamers use, Superman has Ryzen and now we are adding these cool Radeon GPU's to a family of cool stuff, BTW they are also in the new mega fast consoles.

The kids don't watch Steve Burk, they don't even know who he is... they listen to their Twitch Streamers.

When AMD have had the better flagship cards in the past (a long time ago), Nvidia usually resort to software measures to artificially lock AMD out of a feature, or a performance mode, or resort to lowering image quality in drivers.

That said, I highly doubt AMD's top end big navi card will outperform Nvidia's top end. I expect the 3080ti to run rings around big navi, performance per watt wise. It's likely the card I'll get to power my CX48.

AMD has much more chance of having the superior mid-high end offering, in terms of performance per dollar. This won't matter due to the Nvidia influencer army, who'll convince the masses to get the more expensive 3060/3070, over the potentially faster AMD equivalent.

Having the fastest flagship is important in influencing/manipulating the minds of simpletons (who then go on to buy 3050/3060/3070 cards in huge numbers), it's something AMD need to work on.
 
I fully expect prices to rise as you say, and I fully expect people to keep paying.

Look at all the people here with £1500+ LG OLED TVs. They didn't bat an eyelid spending that kind of cash on a TV.

nV+AMD probably (correctly) think CPUs and GPUs could command higher prices than they do.

People have completely accepted the new mid-range GPU price of £400+, and like you say, who knows what the limit is... I don't think we've found it yet!

There is good reason for that and that is the awful stagnated state of the monitor market for the last 5 years. You have poorly made monitors with faults like backlight bleed and other issues which cost more than £2k and don't even come close to being as good as a £1500 OLED tv.

So the equivalent would be Nvidia and AMD having launched nothing but slight incremental improvements for 5 years and then suddenly Intel comes along with a gfx card which is more than twice as fast and they launch it for $799.
 
Right now in consumer electronics, people have stopped caring about price to performance,

No, they haven't. *Some* people might mortgage their lives to buy bragging rights, but that's not new.

I would love for Nvidia to really test this. Release a 3080Ti with decent price/performance, then also release a Titan that has 1gb more VRAM and runs 1% faster for twice the price.

-Then see how many gamers buy "the best".
 
No, they haven't. *Some* people might mortgage their lives to buy bragging rights, but that's not new.

I would love for Nvidia to really test this. Release a 3080Ti with decent price/performance, then also release a Titan that has 1gb more VRAM and runs 1% faster for twice the price.

-Then see how many gamers buy "the best".

Of course, things should happen within reason. Swap that 1% for 30%, and many people will pay 60-100% more for that top 30% performance.

There's a reason premium brands (and premium products) in consumer electronics have been very successful lately. People just buy them. You might not, but enough do so that making those products makes business sense for them.
 
There is good reason for that and that is the awful stagnated state of the monitor market for the last 5 years. You have poorly made monitors with faults like backlight bleed and other issues which cost more than £2k and don't even come close to being as good as a £1500 OLED tv.

So the equivalent would be Nvidia and AMD having launched nothing but slight incremental improvements for 5 years and then suddenly Intel comes along with a gfx card which is more than twice as fast and they launch it for $799.

No OLED is perfect just like no monitor is. OLED and TVs in general are plagued with faults as well. Just poor quality standards.

Obviously I know what I’d risk and own over a £2000 monitor or £2000 OLED but neither technology is far from perfect unless you win the panel lottery which in my experience is quite slim.
 
No OLED is perfect just like no monitor is. OLED and TVs in general are plagued with faults as well. Just poor quality standards.

Obviously I know what I’d risk and own over a £2000 monitor or £2000 OLED but neither technology is far from perfect unless you win the panel lottery which in my experience is quite slim.

OLED imperfections and a panel lottery? Really? Can you back that statement up..
 
OLED imperfections and a panel lottery? Really? Can you back that statement up..

He's probably trolling. Whilst there is no perfect monitor out there, it can't be denied that OLED's are the safest option in terms of panel lottery. There is zero risk of back light bleed, something that all IPS monitors are plagued with.

Of course you can have uniformity issues, though the newer CX OLEDS from LG are a big improvement here too. I don't see anyone in the owners thread complaining of it on this forum, and we have quite a few owners now. The same can't be said for other popular monitor threads, they are all plague with issues.
 
No OLED is perfect just like no monitor is. OLED and TVs in general are plagued with faults as well. Just poor quality standards.

Obviously I know what I’d risk and own over a £2000 monitor or £2000 OLED but neither technology is far from perfect unless you win the panel lottery which in my experience is quite slim.

Indeed OLED has a few minor faults but compared to the horrendous list that monitors are plagued with its miniscule. People should not be having to buy 7 £2000 monitors just to buy one that is almost acceptable with its faults and will still give a far inferior picture than a run of mill £1500 OLED TV.

I mean before the LG came along I was looking at spending £4500 to get the monitor which was going to be an upgrade on the one I have already and now that is even delayed and wont be out until the end of this year/beginning of next.

And I suspect now won;t even look as good as the LG does.
 
It's pretty much just the burn-in that stops me considering OLED, nothing else.

I have the same UI on my screen a lot of the time.

And I only want one screen for all my purposes :)
 
Of course, things should happen within reason.

That's very subjective and varies from one person to the next. I'm still skeptical that Nvidia's sold as many 2080Ti's as they wanted to. I wouldn't expect them to admit if they hadn't though.
hadn't
 
That's very subjective and varies from one person to the next. I'm still skeptical that Nvidia's sold as many 2080Ti's as they wanted to. I wouldn't expect them to admit if they hadn't though.
hadn't

Nvidia's profit margins have been steadily increasing in the last 20 years (37% in 2005, 63% now). Suggesting that people are paying more and more for their high margin products. No business is ever content with the sale of their high margin products so you're right there by definition (also true of every single product ever released in history of mankind), there's no limit to how many X Nvidia wants to sale. They always want to sale more.
 
Nvidia's profit margins have been steadily increasing in the last 20 years (37% in 2005, 63% now). Suggesting that people are paying more and more for their high margin products. No business is ever content with the sale of their high margin products so you're right there by definition (also true of every single product ever released in history of mankind), there's no limit to how many X Nvidia wants to sale. They always want to sale more.


There is a point between supply and demand where maximum *total* profit can be made. Nvidia (any company) can set prices so high that they actual lose money.

Everyone seems to assume Nvidia aren't there yet. We shall see.
 
There is a point between supply and demand where maximum *total* profit can be made. Nvidia (any company) can set prices so high that they actual lose money.

Everyone seems to assume Nvidia aren't there yet. We shall see.

I agree, and I'm one of those people (as much as I hate it).
 
Back
Top Bottom