The new Volvo’s I could spend that kind of money on, don’t think I could on a Skoda.As nice as the Volvo and Skoda are, I can’t imagine ploughing thirty grand into one. If it’s a cash purchase then it has to be BMW or Audi as they will hold their value best, surely?
In terms of the initial depreciation curve they are all much of a muchness from what I can see online, if you spend £30k BMW/Audi might hold value marginally better simply due to being older rather than brand new, but you could fix that problem by spending less (say £25k) on the Skoda i.e. buy one of comparable age to the BMW/Audi. You'd then have parity (at worst) on depreciation but with the added benefit of less initial outlay.As nice as the Volvo and Skoda are, I can’t imagine ploughing thirty grand into one. If it’s a cash purchase then it has to be BMW or Audi as they will hold their value best, surely?
You'd then have parity (at worst) on depreciation but with the added benefit of less initial outlay.
How can a 3 year old Audi A4 still be worth £27k? That seems exceptionally unlikely. To have lost only £5k in depreciation on a 9 month old Audi over 2 years seems very unusual.
A quick glance around Autotrader suggests even if we assume its a high spec 3 litre TDI - quite a rare car - it's low 20's at the very best? Which you'd expect given its age.
There aren't but not many people are going to drop 27k on a 3 year old A4.
Heck I paid about that for my 11 month old 530 with more power![]()
I was being deliberately cautious/generous to avoid making too bold a statement specifically in response to the claim that the BMW/Audi would hold value better, the Superb should be a lot cheaper if you don't spend the money on getting a newer one. If I stop being cautious I'd say you buy a cheaper Superb which costs less money, loses less in depreciation and costs less in tax until the luxury car tax expires on the other cars (assuming April 2017 on).This is surely an argument against the Skoda. You'd want to be quite a long way from parity on depreciation to make it worth choosing over the BMW or Audi. The Superb is an excellent car but it's not a 5 Series or an A6 and you'd be absolutely bonkers to pick one over either of those unless there were considerable financial benefits to do so. The Audi and BMW are simply better cars in virtually every way.
The Superb works really well when the ownership cost is much lower.
Exactly my thoughts. The new 3 feels like a little 5 rather than a big 1. I'll be looking for a M340 once I can get rid of the A6.I never really had a great issue with the old 3 Series all the main controls were exactly the same parts as the 5 Series my main issue was the fake leather being poor along with the 1-8 button for iDrive these never lined up properly on any 3 Series I have been in. New 3 Series Touring is superb they also come well spec'd with the options being in packs now loads of second hand M340i listed have laser headlights/HUD etc I'll probably get one over a 540i.
I never really had a great issue with the old 3 Series all the main controls were exactly the same parts as the 5 Series
New 3 Series Touring is superb they also come well spec'd with the options being in packs now loads of second hand M340i listed have laser headlights/HUD etc I'll probably get one over a 540i.
I've also found this, it's virtually impossible to find a 540i with the right level of spec but by contrast very easy to find an M340i. Size wise the new 3 series is virtually identical to the E39 5 series too. Very tempted myself.
I had one of these as a hire car a while back. It was awesome. I’m not a seasoned premium car expert like Fox so I don’t have an awful lot to compare it with, but I thought it was brilliant at what it did.