It would be quite the generational leap for AMD to match the performance of these cards if the performance really is that much better than Turing (in non RTX games without DLSS).
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards
- Thread starter LoadsaMoney
- Start date
It would be quite the generational leap for AMD to match the performance of these cards if the performance really is that much better than Turing (in non RTX games without DLSS).
But let’s keep the price ramped up...
AMD really have to bring something to the game if we want prices to settle at a more reasonable place.
I said needs dude. There is a big difference between that and what people want.
Back here in reality my three 20 series cards have not changed. They didn't grow warts and can still all run games easily at 1440p (my res of choice).
I can play RDR2 on either of the XB1X I have.
Jen is good at this. Making you think your existing card is a load of old rubbish and how you must sell it at a loss and rush out and buy his latest one. Why would I? I could sit here and bench every game I have (Which is totally different to the ones I actually play !) and smash my monitor's 144hz sync rate.
So Jen is doing every one a huge favour? or could it simply be a worried pre emptive strike against the upcoming consoles, which too target 4k 60. Only, the 3070 will be at its limits at 4k 60, due to the 8gb of VRAM. Meaning, the console for ever so slightly more is the better option. The 3080? still costs more than I reckon the entire console unit will cost, NVME, GPU, CPU and all.
All he has done is drop price to perf back down to Pascal and every one is losing their minds.
I don't want to sit and play my game collection at higher FPS. I really have no ambition to do so. Nothing in this release will make games better.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 22,360
- Location
- Rollergirl
Asked that many pages ago in HUGE letters, was ignored.
Yes because every one is
He's doing what he always does. Pushing you to the next level even if you didn't want to go there.
Screw that. I will keep the 4k TVs I already had and just, you know? plug a console into them.
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 22,360
- Location
- Rollergirl
I must admit, I'm a little suspicious... however, if Nvidia know AMD have something going toe to toe then they seem to know more than AMD. The silence is deafening, which makes no sense.
Thanks I assume that's for all cards too
Seems 3090 is very much a titanf the wording with 3080ti to slot in between at a layer date
Question is do I go founder or aib..
They need to get their finger out then.
Associate
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 189
Seems no one is talking about VRAM or DLSS now...
I don't play any of those games nor do I play at 4k. My questions are:
1) Are these all DLSS games and thus are we getting an accurate comparison?
2) Doesn't 4k increase the difference between graphics card since it's more GPU-intensive? So all those on 1440p or even 1080p should expect a lower performance increase?
I feel like people are being mislead here and assuming an 80% performance increase based on the DF video, when I fear that those of us (most) on 1440p and playing other games are going to see a significantly smaller boost.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is a good result in terms of a good performance increase at a sane price point, but let's try temper things...
I don't play any of those games nor do I play at 4k. My questions are:
1) Are these all DLSS games and thus are we getting an accurate comparison?
2) Doesn't 4k increase the difference between graphics card since it's more GPU-intensive? So all those on 1440p or even 1080p should expect a lower performance increase?
I feel like people are being mislead here and assuming an 80% performance increase based on the DF video, when I fear that those of us (most) on 1440p and playing other games are going to see a significantly smaller boost.
Don't get me wrong, I think this is a good result in terms of a good performance increase at a sane price point, but let's try temper things...
wow the boat goes round and round here at oc uk
a few pages back people were backing funnof RTx3000 saying it will be too weak and now people are saying it offers too much performance!?? Wow you can't please people
How many people do you know with 8K TVs or plans to buy one?
It's OK, we know how silly you feel... you don't need to drag it out, tear by tear.
It doesn't matter what comes out I buy for me every 2 years and my wife gets a free card. There's no such thing as buyers remorse when you earn *secret* working for *secret - would genuinely lose my job for boasting* due to covid-19.
Associate
- Joined
- 3 May 2007
- Posts
- 2,144
For months I was saying 3000 series will be slightly cheaper than 2000 series and everyone will think they are getting a bargain. Completely forgetting the massive ramp up on pricing only 1 gen before.
Annnnddd the award for: "Most Insecure Poster With Obviousr Inferiority Complex Of The Month" goes to... *drumroll*