• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

NVIDIA ‘Ampere’ 8nm Graphics Cards

I have a 2080Ti and knew these cards would be killer, but decided to keep on to it till I buy my 3080/3090. I can’t be doing without a GPU for months and ultimately decided to take the financial hit.

Probably regret it down the line, but at least I can still enjoy games for now..
 
It makes no sense at all to release in just a few months cards with 16GB / 20GB of ram when the series has just released.

I expect we might see cards with more vram when they do the refresh with a Super in about 12 months time.

The 2000 series Supers launched 10 months after the initial 2000 series so I cannot see Nvidia cheesing off their customers who buy a 3070 or a 3080 by releasing new cards mere months later.


I think Nvidia punched *hard* with the 3000 launch, hoping to stave off AMD, but if AMD beats the 3080, Nvidia will not wait 12 or even 10 months. Even if they have to paper-launch and drip-feed an improved version of the 3080 while they wait for yields to catch up, they will do *something*.
 
I have a 2080Ti and knew these cards would be killer, but decided to keep on to it till I buy my 3080/3090. I can’t be doing without a GPU for months and ultimately decided to take the financial hit.

Probably regret it down the line, but at least I can still enjoy games for now..
Could you not have bought a temporary solution from MM for a month like a cheap gtx 1070 or something?
 
Shame the 3080 doesn't have a bit more VRAM to make people more comfortable with ordering it. Though it may not matter as much at 1440p and below ultra settings, really not sure but in any case it seems to be cutting it close even according to that ID software guy.. hmm
 
It all depends how AMD respond. If AMD respond strong, NVIDIA will refresh.

They NEED to be the top dogs in the GPU world and they will NOT give up that crown IMO.
 
Shame the 3080 doesn't have a bit more VRAM to make people more comfortable with ordering it. Though it may not matter as much at 1440p and below ultra settings, really not sure but in any case it seems to be cutting it close even according to that ID software guy.. hmm

Yeah even 12GB I wouldn't think twice as it is I'm like hmmm. (Even though I probably won't hit the limits of 10GB before I upgrade next - but coming from an 8GB GPU it seems short sighted).
 
So, what ever happened to new driver ui, nvcache and diss 3.0? :p

One of them was there, it was just Nvidia RTX IO rather than Nvcache... same idea as was mooted, different name.

I suppose there is still time to show a new UI, wouldn’t necessarily have to coincide with GPU launch. One thing for sure is that they could really do with a modernised UI overhaul.

DLSS only got a 2.1 not a 3.0, so that one is definitely MIA.
 
One of them was there, it was just Nvidia RTX IO rather than Nvcache... same idea as was mooted, different name.

I suppose there is still time to show a new UI, wouldn’t necessarily have to coincide with GPU launch. One thing for sure is that they could really do with a modernised UI overhaul.

DLSS only got a 2.1 not a 3.0, so that one is definitely MIA.
I thought NVCache would be more like HBCC. RTX IO is essential DirectStorage or whatever it is called from Microsoft.
 
@TNA

Well I mean NVcache never actually existed other than as a rumour from MLID who is the source all others quoted. Whether he made it up or does have a source who told him something is up for debate! Some seemed to infer a HBCC equivalence but quoting from mlid’s video he doesn’t say it works like HBCC, he says it’s Nvidia's answer to HBCC:

NVcache is coming, and it’s Nvidia’s answer to HBCC:

- it leverages both your DDR and SSD for enhanced load times & VRAM.

RTX IO leverages your SSD for enhanced load times and more efficient VRAM usage... it’s more or less what he said (not sure there’s any ddr component, but they describe it as a “suite” so potentially there are details to learn yet as to how it works in reality outside of a very high level overview we got).

And yes, it does appear to be their implementation of MS’ direct storage API... although conceptually closer to MS’ whole “velocity architecture” imo than just the direct storage API as it also features the hardware accelerated decompression which is an important factor in its potential usefulness. Overall it fits the “NVcache” rumour pretty well, albeit by a different name. So that’s the answer to your question of what happened to it.
 
Last edited:
Nvidia has provided some extra details today on the 3000.

The RTX3080 typically draws 310-320w power at load, in Nvidia tests the card settles at 80c with a fan noise of 32db


Ive seen people wanting to buy a 3080/3090 and have a 4790k, I mean like what the ****
 
Back
Top Bottom